ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Novel Pyroptosis-Related Gene Signatures Identified as the Prognostic Biomarkers for Bladder Carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel cuproptosis-related prognostic gene signature and validation of differential expression in colon cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- A DIA-MS-based proteomics approach to find potential serum prognostic biomarkers in glioblastoma patients.Molecular oncology · 2025Article
- CRTAC1 identified as a promising diagnosis and prognostic biomarker in lung adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Transcriptome sequencing and network pharmacology-based approach to reveal the effect and mechanism of Ji Chuan Jian against Parkinson's disease.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2023Article
- Analysis and identification of the necroptosis landscape on therapy and prognosis in bladder cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bladder carcinoma (BLCA) is a common malignant tumor with high morbidity and mortality in the urinary system. Pyroptosis is a pattern of programmed cell death that is closely associated with progression of tumors. Therefore, it is significant to probe the expression of pyroptosis-related genes (PRGs) in BLCA. Methods: The differentially expressed genes in normal and BLCA tissues were first obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database analysis, as well as PRGs from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database, intersecting to obtain differentially expressed pyroptosis-related genes (DEPRGs) in BLCA. With the construction of a prognostic model of pyroptosis by regression analysis, we derived and validated key genes, which were ascertained as a separate prognostic marker by individual prognostic and clinical relevance analysis. In addition, we gained six immune cells from the Tumor Immune Evaluation Resource (TIMER) website and analyzed the relationship between pyroptosis prognostic genes and immune infiltration. Result: Our results revealed that 31 DEPRGs were available by comparing normal and BLCA tissues with |log2 (fold change, FC)| > 0.5 and FDR <0.05. Four key genes (CRTAC1, GSDMB, AIM2, and FOXO3) derived from the pyroptosis prognostic model were experimentally validated for consistent expression in BLCA patients. Following risk scoring, the low-risk group of BLCA patients had noticeably higher overall survival (OS) than the high-risk group ( Conclusion: Genes (CRTAC1, GSDMB, AIM2, and FOXO3) associated with pyroptosis are potential BLCA prognostic biomarkers that act as an essential part in the predictive prognosis of survival and immunotherapy of BLCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.