Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35847817›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

A Prospective Study Evaluating Cumulative Incidence and a Specific Prediction Rule in Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19.

Carla Suarez Castillejo, Nuria Toledo-Pons, Néstor Calvo, Luisa Ramon-Clar, Joaquín Martínez, Sara Hermoso de Mendoza, Daniel Morell-García, Josep Miquel Bauça, Francisco Berga, Belén Núñez and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychological Impact of Pulmonary Embolism: A Narrative Review.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2025
    Review
  2. Cardiopulmonary Complications after Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carla Suarez CastillejoServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Nuria Toledo-PonsServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Néstor CalvoServicio de Radiodiagnostico, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Luisa Ramon-ClarServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Joaquín MartínezServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Sara Hermoso de MendozaComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Daniel Morell-GarcíaInstitut d'Investigació Sanitària Illes Balears (IdISBa), Palma, Spain.
Josep Miquel BauçaServicio de Análisis Clínicos, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Francisco BergaServicio de Análisis Clínicos, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Belén NúñezServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Luminita PredaServicio de Radiodiagnostico, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Jaume SauledaServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Paula Argente CastilloServicio de Análisis Clínicos, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Antonieta BallesterosServicio de Análisis Clínicos, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Luisa MartínServicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Ernest Sala-LlinasServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Alberto Alonso-FernándezServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Son Espases · ESHealth Research Institute of the Balearic Islands · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale: Abnormal values of hypercoagulability biomarkers, such as D-dimer, have been described in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has also been associated with disease severity and in-hospital mortality. COVID-19 patients with pneumonia are at greater risk of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the real incidence of PE is not yet clear, since studies have been limited in size, mostly retrospective, and PE diagnostic procedures were only performed when PE was clinically suspected. Objectives: (1) To determine the incidence, clinical, radiological, and biological characteristics, and clinical outcomes of PE among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia with D-dimer > 1,000 ng/mL. (2) To develop a prognostic model to predict PE in these patients. Methods: Single-center prospective cohort study. Consecutive confirmed cases of COVID-19 pneumonia with D-dimer > 1,000 ng/mL underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA). Demographic and laboratory data, comorbidities, CTPA scores, treatments administered, and clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared between patients with and without PE. A risk score was constructed from all these variables. Results: Between 6 April 2020 and 2 February 2021, 179 consecutive patients were included. The overall incidence of PE was 39.7% (71 patients) (CI 95%, 32-47%). In patients with PE, emboli were located mainly in segmental/subsegmental arteries (67%). Patients with PE did not differ from the non-PE group in sex, age, or risk factors for thromboembolic disease. Higher urea, D-Dimer, D-dimer-to-ferritin and D-dimer-to-lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ratios, platelet distribution width (PDW), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) values were found in patients with PE when compared to patients with non-PE. Besides, lymphocyte counts turned out to be lower in patients with PE. A score for PE prediction was constructed with excellent overall performance [area under the ROC curve-receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.89)]. The PATCOM score stands for Conclusion: COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and D-dimer values > 1,000 ng/mL were presented with a very high incidence of PE, regardless of clinical suspicion. Significant differences in urea, D-dimer, PDW, NLR, and lymphocyte count were found between patients with PE and non-PE. The PATCOM score is presented in this study as a promising PE prediction rule, although validation in further studies is required.

Indexed as

clinical decision rulecomputed tomography angiographycoronavirus infectionsfibrin fibrinogen degradation productspandemicsSARS-CoV-2venous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID35847817
PMCPMC9283900
OpenAlexW4283761123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.