ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Deep Learning Models for Segmenting Non-perfusion Area of Color Fundus Photographs in Patients With Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-based diagnostic model construction and quantitative analysis of retinal vein occlusion lesions using color fundus photographs.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Intergrader Agreement on Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Using Ultra-Widefield Imaging: INSPIRED Study Report 1.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of Advances in AI-Assisted Analysis of Fundus Fluorescein Angiography (FFA) Images: From Detection to Report Generation.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Review
- Prediction of treatment outcome for branch retinal vein occlusion using convolutional neural network-based retinal fluorescein angiography.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Retina Fundus Photograph-Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Medicine: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Review
- Retinal Vein Occlusion-Background Knowledge and Foreground Knowledge Prospects-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Deep learning segmentation of non-perfusion area from color fundus images and AI-generated fluorescein angiography.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Early Diagnosis of Retinal Diseases.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Intelligent diagnosis of retinal vein occlusion based on color fundus photographs.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Research progress on diagnosing retinal vascular diseases based on artificial intelligence and fundus images.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Research progress in artificial intelligence assisted diabetic retinopathy diagnosis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Advances in artificial intelligence models and algorithms in the field of optometry.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Wide field imaging biomarkers: A different perspective.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop artificial intelligence (AI)-based deep learning (DL) models for automatically detecting the ischemia type and the non-perfusion area (NPA) from color fundus photographs (CFPs) of patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 274 CFPs from patients diagnosed with BRVO. All DL models were trained using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) based on 45 degree CFPs covering the fovea and the optic disk. We first trained a DL algorithm to identify BRVO patients with or without the necessity of retinal photocoagulation from 219 CFPs and validated the algorithm on 55 CFPs. Next, we trained another DL algorithm to segment NPA from 104 CFPs and validated it on 29 CFPs, in which the NPA was manually delineated by 3 experienced ophthalmologists according to fundus fluorescein angiography. Both DL models have been cross-validated 5-fold. The recall, precision, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the DL models in comparison with three types of independent ophthalmologists of different seniority. Results: In the first DL model, the recall, precision, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.75 ± 0.08, 0.80 ± 0.07, 0.79 ± 0.02, and 0.82 ± 0.03, respectively, for predicting the necessity of laser photocoagulation for BRVO CFPs. The second DL model was able to segment NPA in CFPs of BRVO with an AUC of 0.96 ± 0.02. The recall, precision, and accuracy for segmenting NPA was 0.74 ± 0.05, 0.87 ± 0.02, and 0.89 ± 0.02, respectively. The performance of the second DL model was nearly comparable with the senior doctors and significantly better than the residents. Conclusion: These results indicate that the DL models can directly identify and segment retinal NPA from the CFPs of patients with BRVO, which can further guide laser photocoagulation. Further research is needed to identify NPA of the peripheral retina in BRVO, or other diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.