Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35847742›Full record

ArticleEJHaem2020

Favourable outcomes for high-risk Burkitt lymphoma patients (IPI 3-5) treated with rituximab plus CODOX-M/IVAC: Results of a phase 2 UK NCRI trial.

Elizabeth H Phillips, Catherine Burton, Amy A Kirkwood, Sharon Barrans, Anthony Lawrie, Simon Rule, Russell Patmore, Ruth Pettengell, Kirit M Ardeshna, Silvia Montoto and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJHaem, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. CODOX-M/IVAC-RHaematologica · 2025
    Article
  5. Rare central nervous system lymphomas.British journal of haematology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth H PhillipsDivision of Cancer Sciences the University of Manchester Manchester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9316-7544
Catherine BurtonHMDS, St James's University Hospital Leeds UK.
Amy A KirkwoodCancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute University College London London UK.
Sharon BarransHMDS, St James's University Hospital Leeds UK.
Anthony LawrieCancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute University College London London UK.
Simon RulePlymouth University Medical School Plymouth UK.
Russell PatmoreHaematology Department, Castle Hill Hospital Hull UK.
Ruth PettengellClinical Sciences Department, St George's University of London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9948-660X
Kirit M ArdeshnaHaematology Department University College Hospital London London UK.
Silvia MontotoHaemato-oncology Department Barts Health NHS Trust London UK.
Shankara PaneeshaHaematology Department Heart of England NHS Trust Birmingham UK.
Laura Clifton-HadleyCancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute University College London London UK.
David C LinchUCL Cancer Institute University College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9988-5528
Andrew K McMillanHaematology Department Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Nottingham UK.
Cancer Research UK · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBCastle Hill Hospital · GBCRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence · GBHeart of England NHS Foundation Trust · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Outcomes after frontline treatment of Burkitt lymphoma (BL) have improved with the introduction of dose-intense chemotherapy regimens, such as CODOX-M/IVAC. While rituximab has increased survival rates for most forms of high-grade B-cell lymphoma, there has previously been hesitancy about incorporating it into BL treatment, partly due to concerns about increased toxicity. Prospective data using the standard dose CODOX-M/IVAC regimen in combination with rituximab are lacking. We conducted a single-arm phase 2 trial to assess the efficacy and toxicity of R-CODOX-M/R-IVAC. Methods: Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years, with newly diagnosed BL with Results: Thirty-eight patients were registered but after central pathology review, 27 patients had confirmed BL and commenced study treatment. Median age was 35 years, 14.8% patients had central nervous system involvement and 18.5% were HIV positive. Twenty-two (81.4%) patients completed four cycles of chemotherapy. There were two treatment-related deaths (7.4%). Two-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 77.2% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 56.0-89.0) and 80.7% (90% CI: 59.6-91.5), respectively. Conclusions: This prospective trial demonstrates excellent survival rates with R-CODOX-M/R-IVAC in a high-risk BL cohort. It provides reassuring evidence regarding the feasibility of this regimen and also provides a benchmark for future studies.

Indexed as

chemotherapyCNSHIVimmunotherapylymphomasmonoclonal antibodies

Identifiers

PMID35847742
PMCPMC9176097
OpenAlexW3021022918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.