ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022
A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning prediction of motor function in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Machine learning-based prediction of activities of daily living in patients with stroke and other acquired brain injuries.Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a prognostic prediction model of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) induced by large-vessel occlusion (LVO), this study applied machine learning classification model light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) to construct a unique prediction model. Methods: A total of 973 patients were enrolled, primary outcome was assessed with modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days, and favorable outcome was defined using mRS 0-2 scores. Besides, LightGBM algorithm and logistic regression (LR) were used to construct a prediction model. Then, a prediction scale was further established and verified by both internal data and other external data. Results: A total of 20 presurgical variables were analyzed using LR and LightGBM. The results of LightGBM algorithm indicated that the accuracy and precision of the prediction model were 73.77 and 73.16%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.824. Furthermore, the top 5 variables suggesting unfavorable outcomes were namely admitting blood glucose levels, age, onset to EVT time, onset to hospital time, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (importance = 130.9, 102.6, 96.5, 89.5 and 84.4, respectively). According to AUC, we established the key cutoff points and constructed prediction scale based on their respective weightings. Then, the established prediction scale was verified in raw and external data and the sensitivity was 80.4 and 83.5%, respectively. Finally, scores >3 demonstrated better accuracy in predicting unfavorable outcomes. Conclusion: Presurgical prediction scale is feasible and accurate in identifying unfavorable outcomes of AIS after EVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.