Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35847635›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Biomechanical Test of a New Endoprosthesis for Cylindrical Medullary Canals in Dogs.

Rosa Mendaza-DeCal, Yolanda Ballesteros, Salvador Peso-Fernandez, Eva Paz, Juan Carlos Del Real-Romero, Jesus Rodriguez-Quiros

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosa Mendaza-DeCalAnimal Medicine and Surgery Department, Veterinary Faculty, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Yolanda BallesterosInstitute for Research in Technology/Mechanical Engineering Department, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, Spain.
Salvador Peso-FernandezABAX Innovation Technologies, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain.
Eva PazInstitute for Research in Technology/Mechanical Engineering Department, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Carlos Del Real-RomeroInstitute for Research in Technology/Mechanical Engineering Department, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, Spain.
Jesus Rodriguez-QuirosAnimal Medicine and Surgery Department, Veterinary Faculty, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Comillas Pontifical University · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exo-endoprosthesis is a limb salvage procedure for animals, although only expensive metal devices have been described. Now-a-days, new materials for this type of implant could be considered due to novel and affordable manufacturing techniques. However, a factor of safety (FoS) should be considered. There are kinetic and kinematic studies of canine natural gaits, which can be used to establish an FoS for mechanical tests for new non-metallic devices. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is used in different specialties in human medicine. Its mechanical properties (and its close mechanical stiffness to that of bone) make this polymer an alternative to metals in veterinary traumatology. PEEK could also be used in 3D printing. The suitability of a novel inner part of an exo-endoprosthesis manufactured by fuse deposition modeling (FDM) was presented in this study for long canine bones. Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed PEEK material and

Indexed as

biomechanical testcanineexo-endoprosthesisex vivoFDMpatient-specific implantPEEKtibia

Identifiers

PMID35847635
PMCPMC9280675
OpenAlexW4283746828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.