Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35847603›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2022

Identification and diagnosis of meniscus tear by magnetic resonance imaging using a deep learning model.

Jie Li, Kun Qian, Jinyong Liu, Zhijun Huang, Yuchen Zhang, Guoqian Zhao, Huifen Wang, Meng Li, Xiaohan Liang, Fang Zhou and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AI for Lesion Detection in Musculoskeletal Radiology.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Achieving high accuracy in meniscus tear detection using advanced deep learning models with a relatively small data set.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Federated knee injury diagnosis using few shot learning.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jie LiState Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Division of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, China.
Kun QianHangzhou Lancet Robotics Company Ltd, China.
Jinyong LiuHangzhou Lancet Robotics Company Ltd, China.
Zhijun HuangHangzhou Lancet Robotics Company Ltd, China.
Yuchen ZhangTaikang Xianlin Drum Tower Hospital, China.
Guoqian ZhaoDanyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Huifen WangThe Second People's Hospital of Xuanwei, China.
Meng LiCancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Science, China.
Xiaohan LiangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, China.
Fang ZhouXinxiang Central Hospital, China.
Xiuying YuLin Yi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Lan LiState Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Division of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, China.
Xingsong WangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, China.
Xianfeng YangDepartment of Radiology, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, China.
Qing JiangState Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Division of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Meniscus tear is a common problem in sports trauma, and its imaging diagnosis mainly relies on MRI. To improve the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, a deep learning model was employed in this study and the identification efficiency was evaluated. Methods: Standard knee MRI images from 924 individual patients were used to complete the training, validation and testing processes. Mask regional convolutional neural network (R-CNN) was used to build the deep learning network structure, and ResNet50 was adopted to develop the backbone network. The deep learning model was trained and validated with a dataset containing 504 and 220 patients, respectively. Internal testing was performed based on a dataset of 200 patients, and 180 patients from 8 hospitals were regarded as an external dataset for model validation. Additionally, 40 patients who were diagnosed by the arthroscopic surgery were enrolled as the final test dataset. Results: After training and validation, the deep learning model effectively recognized healthy and injured menisci. Average precision for the three types of menisci (healthy, torn and degenerated menisci) ranged from 68% to 80%. Diagnostic accuracy for healthy, torn and degenerated menisci was 87.50%, 86.96%, and 84.78%, respectively. Validation results from external dataset demonstrated that the accuracy of diagnosing torn and intact meniscus tear through 3.0T MRI images was higher than 80%, while the accuracy verified by arthroscopic surgery was 87.50%. Conclusion: Mask R-CNN effectively identified and diagnosed meniscal injuries, especially for tears that occurred in different parts of the meniscus. The recognition ability was admirable, and the diagnostic accuracy could be further improved with increased training sample size. Therefore, this deep learning model showed great potential in diagnosing meniscus injuries. Translational potential of this article: Deep learning model exerted unique effect in terms of reducing doctors' workload and improving diagnostic accuracy. Injured and healthy menisci could be more accurately identified and classified based on training and learning datasets. This model could also distinguish torn from degenerated menisci, making it an effective tool for MRI-assisted diagnosis of meniscus injuries in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AD, anterior horn degenerationAH_intact, anterior horn healthAH_tear, anterior horn tearAIAI, artificial intelligenceAP, average precisionCA, cartilage tissueDeep learning modelFN, false negativeFP, false positiveFS FSE PDWI, fat-suppressed fast spin-echo proton density-weighted imageIoU, intersection over unionMBD, meniscus body degenerationMBH, meniscus body healthMBT, meniscus body tearMeniscus injuryMRIMRI, magnetic resonance imagingPD, posterior horn degenerationPDW, proton density-weightedPH_intact, posterior horn healthPH_tear, posterior horn tearR-CNN, regional convolutional neural networkRegional Convolutional Neural NetworkROI, region of interestRPN, region proposal networkTP, true positive

Identifiers

PMID35847603
PMCPMC9253363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.