ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2022
Coefficient-of-variation-based channel selection with a new testing framework for MI-based BCI.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coherence-based channel selection and Riemannian geometry features for magnetoencephalography decoding.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- STGAT-CS: spatio-temporal-graph attention network based channel selection for MI-based BCI.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Identifying optimal channels and features for multi-participant motor imagery experiments across a participant's multi-day multi-class EEG data.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Novel channel selection model based on graph convolutional network for motor imagery.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the motor-imagery (MI) based brain computer interface (BCI), multi-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) is often used to ensure the complete capture of physiological phenomena. With the redundant information and noise, EEG signals cannot be easily converted into separable features through feature extraction algorithms. Channel selection algorithms are proposed to address the issue, in which the filtering technique is widely used with the advantages of low computational cost and strong practicability. In this study, we proposed several improved methods for filtering channel selection algorithm. Specifically, based on the coefficient of variation and inter-class distance, a novel channel classification method was designed, which divided channels into different categories based on their contribution to feature extraction process. Then a filtering channel selection algorithm was proposed according to the previous classification method. Moreover, a new testing framework for filtering channel selection algorithms was proposed, which can better reflect the generalization ability of the algorithm. Experimental results indicated that the proposed channel classification method is effective, and the proposed testing framework is better than the original one. Meanwhile, the proposed channel selection algorithm achieved the accuracy of 87.7% and 81.7% in two BCI competition datasets, respectively, which was superior to competing algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.