Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35847539›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2022

Deep-layer motif method for estimating information flow between EEG signals.

Denggui Fan, Hui Wang, Jun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Denggui FanSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083 China.ORCID 0000-0002-1447-1749
Hui WangSchool of Information Network Security, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing, 100038 China.
Jun WangSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate identification for the information flow between epileptic seizure signals is the key to construct the directional epileptic brain network which can be used to localize epileptic focus. In this paper, our concern is on how to improve the direction identification of information flow and also investigate how it can be cut off or weakened. In view of this, we propose the deep-layer motif method. Based on the directional index (DI) estimation using permutation conditional mutual information, the effectiveness of the proposed deep-layer motif method is numerically assessed with the coupled mass neural model. Furthermore, we investigate the robustness of this method in considering the interference of autaptic coupling, time delay and short-term plasticity. Results show that compared to the simple 1-layer motif method, the 2nd- and 3rd-layer motif methods have the dominant enhancement effects for the direction identification. In particular, deep-layer motif method possesses good anti-jamming performance and good robustness in calculating DI. In addition, we investigate the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on the information flow. It is found that this deep-layer motif method is still superior to the single-layer motif method in direction identification and is robust to weak DBS. However, the high-frequency strong DBS can effectively decrease the DI suggesting the weakened information flow. These results may give new insights into the seizure detection and control.

Indexed as

Deep brain stimulation (DBS)Deep-layer motifDirection identificationNeural field modelPermutation conditional mutual information(PCMI)Short-term plasticity

Identifiers

PMID35847539
PMCPMC9279550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.