Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35847527›Full record

ArticleDigital health

REDCap mobile data collection: Using implementation science to explore the potential and pitfalls of a digital health tool in routine voluntary medical male circumcision outreach settings in Zimbabwe.

Vi Tran, Farai Gwenzi, Phiona Marongwe, Olbarn Rutsito, Pesanai Chatikobo, Vernon Murenje, Joseph Hove, Tinashe Munyaradzi, Zoe Rogers, Mufuta Tshimanga and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Vi TranDepartment of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Farai GwenziZimbabwe Technical Training and Education Center for Health (Zim-TTECH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Phiona MarongweInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Olbarn RutsitoZimbabwe Association of Church-related Hospitals (ZACH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Pesanai ChatikoboZimbabwe Community Health Intervention Project (ZiCHIRe), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Vernon MurenjeZimbabwe Technical Training and Education Center for Health (Zim-TTECH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Joseph HoveZimbabwe Association of Church-related Hospitals (ZACH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tinashe MunyaradziZimbabwe Community Health Intervention Project (ZiCHIRe), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Zoe RogersDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mufuta TshimangaZimbabwe Community Health Intervention Project (ZiCHIRe), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Vuyelwa Sidile-ChitimbireZimbabwe Association of Church-related Hospitals (ZACH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Sinokuthemba XabaMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Gertrude NcubeMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Lewis MasimbaZimbabwe Technical Training and Education Center for Health (Zim-TTECH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Batsirai Makunike-ChikwinyaZimbabwe Technical Training and Education Center for Health (Zim-TTECH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Marrianne HolecInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Scott BarnhartInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bryan WeinerDepartment of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Caryl FeldackerInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8152-6754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital data collection tools improve data quality but are limited by connectivity. ZAZIC, a Zimbabwean consortium focused on scaling up male circumcision (MC) services, provides MC in outreach settings where both data quality and connectivity is poor. ZAZIC implemented REDCap Mobile app for data collection among roving ZAZIC MC nurses. To inform continued scale-up or discontinuation, this paper details if, how, and for whom REDCap improved data quality using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Methods: Data were collected for this retrospective, cross-sectional study for nine months, from July 2019 to March 2020, before COVID-19 paused MC services. Data completeness was compared between paper- and REDCap-based tools and between two ZAZIC partners using two sample, one-tailed t-tests. Results: REDCap reached all roving nurses who reported 26,904 MCs from 1773 submissions. REDCap effectiveness, as measured by data completeness, decreased from 89.2% in paper to 76.6% in REDCap app for Partner 1 ( Conclusion: Although initial transition from paper to REDCap showed mixed effectiveness, post-hoc analysis from service resumption found increased REDCap data completeness across partners, suggesting locally-led momentum for REDCap-based data collection. Staff training, consistent mentoring, and continued technical support appear critical for continued use of digital health tools for quality data collection in rural Zimbabwe and similar low connectivity settings.

Indexed as

digital health in routine settingsimplementation sciencemale circumcisionMobile data collectionREDCapZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID35847527
PMCPMC9280838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.