Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35847481›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering

Investigating the limited performance of a deep-learning-based SPECT denoising approach: An observer-study-based characterization.

Zitong Yu, Md Ashequr Rahman, Abhinav K Jha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Can patient-specific acquisition protocol improve performance on defect detection task in myocardial perfusion SPECT?Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An Investigation of Lesion Detection Accuracy for Artificial Intelligence-Based Denoising of Low-DoseJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nuclear Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: Best Practices for Evaluation (the RELAINCE Guidelines).Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zitong YuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Md Ashequr RahmanMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Abhinav K JhaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

A no-gold-standard framework to objectively evaluate quantitative imaging methods with patient dataR01EB031051 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JHA, ABHINAV K · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
A fully automated PET radiomics frameworkR56EB028287 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JHA, ABHINAV K · 2021 to 2021
$493k
Transmission-less attenuation and scatter compensation in myocardial perfusion SPECT with list-mode dataR21EB024647 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JHA, ABHINAV K · 2018 to 2019
$430k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031051NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB024647NIBIB NIH HHS R56 EB028287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple objective assessment of image-quality (OAIQ)-based studies have reported that several deep-learning (DL)-based denoising methods show limited performance on signal-detection tasks. Our goal was to investigate the reasons for this limited performance. To achieve this goal, we conducted a task-based characterization of a DL-based denoising approach for individual signal properties. We conducted this study in the context of evaluating a DL-based approach for denoising single photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) images. The training data consisted of signals of different sizes and shapes within a clustered-lumpy background, imaged with a 2D parallel-hole-collimator SPECT system. The projections were generated at normal and 20% low-count level, both of which were reconstructed using an ordered-subset-expectation-maximization (OSEM) algorithm. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-based denoiser was trained to process the low-count images. The performance of this CNN was characterized for five different signal sizes and four different signal-to-background ratio (SBRs) by designing each evaluation as a signal-known-exactly/background-known-statistically (SKE/BKS) signal-detection task. Performance on this task was evaluated using an anthropomorphic channelized Hotelling observer (CHO). As in previous studies, we observed that the DL-based denoising method did not improve performance on signal-detection tasks. Evaluation using the idea of observer-study-based characterization demonstrated that the DL-based denoising approach did not improve performance on the signal-detection task for any of the signal types. Overall, these results provide new insights on the performance of the DL-based denoising approach as a function of signal size and contrast. More generally, the observer study-based characterization provides a mechanism to evaluate the sensitivity of the method to specific object properties, and may be explored as analogous to characterizations such as modulation transfer function for linear systems. Finally, this work underscores the need for objective task-based evaluation of DL-based denoising approaches.

Indexed as

Deep learningDenoisingModel observerObjective task-based evaluationSPECT

Identifiers

PMID35847481
PMCPMC9286496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.