Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35847445›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2022

Evaluation of clinical outcomes with propensity-score matching for colorectal cancer presenting as an oncologic emergency.

Katsuhiro Ogawa, Yuji Miyamoto, Kazuto Harada, Kojiro Eto, Hiroshi Sawayama, Shiro Iwagami, Masaaki Iwatsuki, Yoshifumi Baba, Naoya Yoshida, Hideo Baba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katsuhiro OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Life Science Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9904-1985
Yuji MiyamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Life Science Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.
Kazuto HaradaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Life Science Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.
Kojiro EtoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Life Science Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.
Hiroshi SawayamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Life Science Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.
Shiro IwagamiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Life Science Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.
Masaaki IwatsukiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Life Science Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0886-4618
Yoshifumi BabaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Life Science Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3657-2388
Naoya YoshidaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Life Science Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8447-5278
Hideo BabaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Life Science Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-2550
Kumamoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Oncologic emergencies such as perforation and obstruction associated with colorectal cancer are serious diseases that can lead to sepsis. Peritoneal dissemination and other factors may cause cancer progression and worsen the patients' long-term prognosis. In this study, we investigated the effect of colorectal cancer presenting as oncologic emergencies on the patients' clinical course. Methods: We performed a retrospective study that included 448 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent primary resection at our institution between January 2014 and December 2018. The primary outcome was overall survival, while secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and postoperative complications. Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival. Results: We identified 56 patients who presented with oncologic emergencies (OE group) and 392 patients who presented with no emergencies (NE group). Propensity-score matching yielded 56 patients in the OE group and 55 in the NE group with balanced baseline covariates. We found a strong association between overall survival (OS) and oncologic emergencies (HR = 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-5.5). The 30-day mortality was not significantly different between the OE and NE groups (4% vs 0%, Conclusion: Colorectal cancer presenting as an oncologic emergency could be safely operated on without increasing the 30-day mortality rate and the incidence of severe postoperative complications. However, the long-term prognosis was poor.

Indexed as

bowel obstructionbowel perforationcolorectal canceroncologic emergencypropensity‐score matching

Identifiers

PMID35847445
PMCPMC9271026
OpenAlexW4220782659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.