ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2022
Evaluation of clinical outcomes with propensity-score matching for colorectal cancer presenting as an oncologic emergency.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Elective and Emergency Surgeries: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic disparities in colorectal cancer oncologic emergencies: a nationwide multilevel analysis in Japan.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Oncologic Surgical Emergencies: A Retrospective Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Disparities in long-term outcomes between benign and malignant diseases after Hartmann's procedure: A retrospective observational study.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Comparison of postoperative prognoses for resectable colorectal cancer with vs. without oncologic emergency using propensity score‑matched analyses: A single-center retrospective observational study.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Evaluation of clinical outcomes with propensity-score matching for colorectal cancer presenting as an oncologic emergency.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2022Article
- Well-designed and properly conducted surgical clinical trials: Randomized control trials and big database analyses.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Oncologic emergencies such as perforation and obstruction associated with colorectal cancer are serious diseases that can lead to sepsis. Peritoneal dissemination and other factors may cause cancer progression and worsen the patients' long-term prognosis. In this study, we investigated the effect of colorectal cancer presenting as oncologic emergencies on the patients' clinical course. Methods: We performed a retrospective study that included 448 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent primary resection at our institution between January 2014 and December 2018. The primary outcome was overall survival, while secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and postoperative complications. Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival. Results: We identified 56 patients who presented with oncologic emergencies (OE group) and 392 patients who presented with no emergencies (NE group). Propensity-score matching yielded 56 patients in the OE group and 55 in the NE group with balanced baseline covariates. We found a strong association between overall survival (OS) and oncologic emergencies (HR = 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-5.5). The 30-day mortality was not significantly different between the OE and NE groups (4% vs 0%, Conclusion: Colorectal cancer presenting as an oncologic emergency could be safely operated on without increasing the 30-day mortality rate and the incidence of severe postoperative complications. However, the long-term prognosis was poor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.