Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35847418›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2022

Comparison of in vitro Killing Effect of

Anon Paichitrojjana, Thep Chalermchai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anon PaichitrojjanaSchool of Anti-Aging and Regenerative Medicine, Mae Fah Luang University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6522-6586
Thep ChalermchaiSchool of Anti-Aging and Regenerative Medicine, Mae Fah Luang University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7839-7835
Mae Fah Luang University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is no single effective treatment for demodicosis; successful treatment requires a multimodal approach. Relapse or recurrence of demodicosis is relatively high, making the therapy challenging. Several reports have documented the successful treatment of demodicosis with acaricidal agents, which aimed at reducing the excessive number of Materials and Methods: A total of 100 standardized skin surface biopsy (SSSB) biopsy slides from 100 patients with demodicosis were randomly divided into five groups, each with 20 slides exposed to immersion oil, Results: The differences between the median ST of DEET 5% (44 min), 10% (22 min), and 20% (14 min) were significant when compared to the negative control group (240 min) with p<0.001, <0.001, <0.001, respectively. While the median ST of permethrin 1% (42 min) was not significantly different from the median ST of DEET 5% (p=0.7395). Conclusion: This study demonstrated the dose-related acaricidal effect of DEET on

Indexed as

DEETDemodex mitesdemodicosisin vitro killing effectN, N-diethyl-meta-toluamidepermethrin

Identifiers

PMID35847418
PMCPMC9278725
OpenAlexW4284958724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.