Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35847304›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Direct Determination of Free Nicotine Content in Tobacco.

Li Li, Hongfei Zhang, Jing Wen, Yi Shen, Dongliang Li, Cheng Luo, Jian Zheng, Juan Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Emerging trends in functional materials for electrochemical sensors in nicotine determination.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2024
    Review
  3. Direct Extraction and Determination of Free Nicotine in Cigarette Smoke.Journal of analytical methods in chemistry · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li LiTechnology Center, China Tobacco Sichuan Industrial Co., Ltd., No. 56, Section 1 of Cheng Long Avenue, Jinjiang District, Chengdu 610066, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1602-4309
Hongfei ZhangNational Tobacco Quality Supervision and Test Center, No. 6, Green Bamboo Street, New and High-Tech Industrial Development District, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Jing WenTechnology Center, China Tobacco Sichuan Industrial Co., Ltd., No. 56, Section 1 of Cheng Long Avenue, Jinjiang District, Chengdu 610066, China.
Yi ShenTechnology Center, China Tobacco Sichuan Industrial Co., Ltd., No. 56, Section 1 of Cheng Long Avenue, Jinjiang District, Chengdu 610066, China.
Dongliang LiTechnology Center, China Tobacco Sichuan Industrial Co., Ltd., No. 56, Section 1 of Cheng Long Avenue, Jinjiang District, Chengdu 610066, China.
Cheng LuoTechnology Center, China Tobacco Sichuan Industrial Co., Ltd., No. 56, Section 1 of Cheng Long Avenue, Jinjiang District, Chengdu 610066, China.
Jian ZhengTechnology Center, China Tobacco Sichuan Industrial Co., Ltd., No. 56, Section 1 of Cheng Long Avenue, Jinjiang District, Chengdu 610066, China.
Juan YangTechnology Center, China Tobacco Sichuan Industrial Co., Ltd., No. 56, Section 1 of Cheng Long Avenue, Jinjiang District, Chengdu 610066, China.
China Tobacco · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate determination of the free nicotine content in tobacco is of great importance for the quality assessment of tobacco leaves and cigarettes, as well as for the study of tar reduction and cigarette formulation. A method based on solvent extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was established for direct determination of free nicotine content in tobacco. Free nicotine extraction from tobacco was optimized, using different solvents and physical techniques (shaking, ultrasonic oscillation, and static extraction). Ultimately, a 24 h static extraction with cyclohexane, followed by GC-MS analysis, gave superior results. The standard addition recovery was 98.0-104.7%, with a limit of detection of 5.3 μg/g and a relative standard deviation between 1.3 and 4.1% (

Identifiers

PMID35847304
PMCPMC9280935
OpenAlexW4283332914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.