ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Comparing Seizures Captured by Rapid Response EEG and Conventional EEG Recordings in a Multicenter Clinical Study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing Dry Electroencephalography With Scalable, Soft, and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Compatible TiAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Point-of-Care EEG for Non-Convulsive Seizure and Status Epilepticus: Advances, Limitations, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Point-of-care electroencephalography for prediction of postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing elective surgery: protocol for a prospective cohort study.Biology methods & protocols · 2026Review
- Point-of-Care Electroencephalography in Acute Neurological Care: A Narrative Review.Neurology international · 2025Review
- Hippocampal network activity forecasts epileptic seizures.Nature medicine · 2024Article
- Continuous versus Routine Electroencephalography in the Intensive Care Unit: A Review of Current Evidence.European neurology · 2024Review
- Automated Seizure Detection in Patients with Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Review of Ceribell™ Rapid-EEG Recordings.Neurocritical care · 2023Article
- An automated detection of epileptic seizures EEG using CNN classifier based on feature fusion with high accuracy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Rapid Response EEG: Current State and Future Directions.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: A recent multicenter prospective study (DECIDE trial) examined the use of Ceribell Rapid Response EEG ( Methods: We identified from 164 patients studied in the DECIDE trial those who had seizures detected on Results: Seizures detected on both EEG systems had similar electrographic appearance and laterality. Seizures detected only on conventional EEG (within 24 h following Conclusions: Our case series demonstrates that electrographic data obtained from initial
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.