ReviewCureus2022
Evaluation of and Current Trends in the Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastric diverticulum misdiagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a case description.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Trends and outcomes for patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for stage I to III gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2025Article
- Effect of Narrative Nursing Intervention on Patients with Specific Digestive Tract Malignancies (Esophageal, Gastric, and Intestinal Cancers): A Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are soft-tissue sarcomas that can occur anywhere in the digestive tract, with the stomach and small intestine being the most common locations. Because no imaging modalities diagnose GIST unequivocally, histological and immunohistochemical confirmation is usually required. Most GISTs are discovered by chance; hence, determining this condition's actual frequency can be challenging. Since diagnosing the tumor could be difficult, including GIST in the differential diagnosis is crucial. The objective of this review is to explore the multiple treatment options for this tumor and provide clinicians with more information on the evolving treatment modalities, which in the future could be a possible solution to cure GIST ultimately. After exploring several studies, the authors conclude that early detection is critical since the treatment depends on the tumor size, mitotic rate, and location. Medical management using targeted therapy approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) include tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib. Surgical resection of the tumor is also done in cases with localized tumors. Standard chemotherapy and radiotherapy are not commonly used to treat GIST patients. However, radiotherapy may be used as a palliative therapy to ease pain (such as bone pain) or control bleeding. Additional research is needed to establish potential therapeutic targets that will result in higher and longer-term response rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.