Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35846888›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Tucuxi-BLAST: Enabling fast and accurate record linkage of large-scale health-related administrative databases through a DNA-encoded approach.

José Deney Araujo, Juan Carlo Santos-E-Silva, André Guilherme Costa-Martins, Vanderson Sampaio, Daniel Barros de Castro, Robson F de Souza, Jeevan Giddaluru, Pablo Ivan P Ramos, Robespierre Pita, Mauricio L Barreto and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

José Deney AraujoDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Juan Carlo Santos-E-SilvaDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7327-4294
André Guilherme Costa-MartinsDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Vanderson SampaioFundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Brazil.
Daniel Barros de CastroFundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Robson F de SouzaDepartamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5284-4630
Jeevan GiddaluruDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Pablo Ivan P RamosOswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9075-7861
Robespierre PitaOswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Mauricio L BarretoOswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0215-4930
Manoel Barral-NettoOswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5823-7903
Helder I NakayaDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5297-9108

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Public health research frequently requires the integration of information from different data sources. However, errors in the records and the high computational costs involved make linking large administrative databases using record linkage (RL) methodologies a major challenge. Methods: We present Tucuxi-BLAST, a versatile tool for probabilistic RL that utilizes a DNA-encoded approach to encrypt, analyze and link massive administrative databases. Tucuxi-BLAST encodes the identification records into DNA. BLASTn algorithm is then used to align the sequences between databases. We tested and benchmarked on a simulated database containing records for 300 million individuals and also on four large administrative databases containing real data on Brazilian patients. Results: Our method was able to overcome misspellings and typographical errors in administrative databases. In processing the RL of the largest simulated dataset (200k records), the state-of-the-art method took 5 days and 7 h to perform the RL, while Tucuxi-BLAST only took 23 h. When compared with five existing RL tools applied to a gold-standard dataset from real health-related databases, Tucuxi-BLAST had the highest accuracy and speed. By repurposing genomic tools, Tucuxi-BLAST can improve data-driven medical research and provide a fast and accurate way to link individual information across several administrative databases.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchMedical Record LinkageBrazilDatabases, FactualHumansPublic HealthBLASTDNA-encodedEpidemiologyGenomic toolsRecord linkage

Identifiers

PMID35846888
PMCPMC9281601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.