ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Comparison of Tamsulosin and Tadalafil effects in LUTS treatment considering patients' atherosclerosis risk level.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To date, no study evaluates the effect of atherosclerosis risk level on the efficacy of BPH drug therapies. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the effect of atherosclerosis risk levels on the effectiveness of Tamsulosin and Tadalafil in LUTS treatment. Methods: The present study was a randomized clinical trial that assessed men with LUTS symptoms (at least six months). The inclusion criteria were being older than 50 years, international prostate symptom score (IPSS) ≥ 13, and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) between 4 and 15 ml/s. Framingham Risk Score was used to measure atherosclerosis risk. The patients were classified into four groups, including group 1: Patients with low risk and treated with Tamsulosin (0.4 mg/day), group 2: Patients with low risk and treated with Tadalafil (5 mg/day), group 3: Patients with high risk and treated with Tamsulosin (0.4 mg/day), group 4: Patients with high risk and treated with Tadalafil (5 mg/day). Results: The study included 44 and 38 patients receiving Tamsulosin and Tadalafil, respectively. The means (SD) of the baseline age for the Tamsulosin and Tadalafil groups were equal to 60.6 (6.8) and 58.8 (6.7), respectively (p-value = 0.213). The models revealed no impact of the atherosclerosis risk level on the drugs' effects (p-values = 0.378, 0.975, 0.743 for IPSS, QMAX, and VOID, respectively). Conclusions: The present study's findings could not show the impact of atherosclerosis risk levels on the efficiency of Tamsolusin and Tadalafil in men with LUTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.