Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35846576›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of microbiology2022

Bacterial Performance in Crack Healing and its Role in Creating Sustainable Construction.

Digafe Alemu, Wubetie Demiss, Gamachis Korsa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Digafe AlemuCenter of Excellence for Biotechnology and Bioprocess, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, P.O. Box 16417, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0249-0926
Wubetie DemissCenter of Excellence for Biotechnology and Bioprocess, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, P.O. Box 16417, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gamachis KorsaCenter of Excellence for Biotechnology and Bioprocess, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, P.O. Box 16417, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5629-9767

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building practices began with human civilization. Cement is the most commonly used building construction material throughout the world. These traditional building materials have their own environmental impact during production, transportation, and construction, but also have limitations on building quality and cost. Biological construction materials are currently emerging technology to combat emissions from the construction sector. Different civil and biotechnology researchers have turned to microorganisms for the production of bio construction materials that are environmentally friendly, socially acceptable, and economically feasible but can also produce high strength. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and X-Ray diffraction (XRD) are the most characterization methods used to observe and ensure the production of calcite precipitate as bacterial concrete. As compared to conventional concrete, bacterial concrete was greater by 35.15% in compressive strength, 24.32% in average tensile strength, and 17.24% in average flexural strength, and it was 4 times lower in water absorption and 8 times lower in acid resistivity than conventional concrete. Genetic engineering has great potential to further enhance the mechanical strength of bacterial concrete for use in crack repairs in existing buildings.

Identifiers

PMID35846576
PMCPMC9283063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.