ArticleHeliyon2022
Socio-spatial vulnerability assessment of heritage buildings through using space syntax.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research aims to assess vulnerable spaces around heritage buildings concerning their socio-spatial properties. Additionally, the research explores the predictive relationship between these properties and contextual anthropogenic hazards. The research's methodology relies on multi-methods applied to twenty-eight heritage buildings in historic Cairo, Egypt. Firstly, the research employed the Delphi technique and ICCROM-CCI-RCE method to assess the potential rates of contextual anthropogenic hazards in the study area. Afterwards, the literature review was conducted to explore a new paradigm for assessing vulnerable spaces using the space syntax-based methodology. Space syntax provides a better understanding of space, its structure, and how it affects human behaviour. Moreover, the research employed two main analytical methods of space syntax, axial graph, and visual graph analyses, which were achieved by "Depthmap 4" software to investigate the syntactic context of the study area. Furthermore, the exploratory factor analysis was employed to statistically analyse the syntactic output data to develop fewer factors of socio-spatial vulnerability. These factors served as inputs for multiple linear regression analysis as predictive models of the influence of socio-spatial vulnerability on the assessed contextual anthropogenic hazards. Finally, the resulting models highlighted the importance of investigating the socio-spatial properties around heritage buildings to predict human destructive behaviours based on quantitative analytical methods. Such results would help authorities formulate suitable and sustainable strategies for the adequate performance of heritage buildings. Also, the predictive models can potentially be used in other livable historic cities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.