Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35846437›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of clinical practice2022

Characteristics of Pharmacists' Interventions Related to Proton-Pump Inhibitors in French Hospitals: An Observational Study.

A L Yailian, E Huet, B Charpiat, O Conort, M Juste, R Roubille, M Bourdelin, J Gravoulet, C Mongaret, C Vermorel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

A L YailianPharmacy Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
E HuetPharmacy Department, Dieppe Hospital, Dieppe, France.
B CharpiatPharmacy Department, Croix Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon 69004, France.
O ConortWorking Group 'Valorization of Pharmaceutical Interventions/Valorisation des Interventions Pharmaceutiques - Act-IP©' of the French Society for Clinical Pharmacy, Marseille, France.
M JusteWorking Group 'Valorization of Pharmaceutical Interventions/Valorisation des Interventions Pharmaceutiques - Act-IP©' of the French Society for Clinical Pharmacy, Marseille, France.
R RoubillePharmacy Department, Lucien Hussel Hospital, Vienne, France.
M BourdelinWorking Group 'Valorization of Pharmaceutical Interventions/Valorisation des Interventions Pharmaceutiques - Act-IP©' of the French Society for Clinical Pharmacy, Marseille, France.
J GravouletWorking Group 'Valorization of Pharmaceutical Interventions/Valorisation des Interventions Pharmaceutiques - Act-IP©' of the French Society for Clinical Pharmacy, Marseille, France.
C MongaretWorking Group 'Valorization of Pharmaceutical Interventions/Valorisation des Interventions Pharmaceutiques - Act-IP©' of the French Society for Clinical Pharmacy, Marseille, France.
C VermorelUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS/TIMC UMR5525, F-38041, Grenoble, France.
P BedouchUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS/TIMC UMR5525, F-38041, Grenoble, France.
A Janoly-DuménilPharmacy Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0949-1278
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRSociety for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions · USUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCentre Médical de La Teppe · FRHôpital Saint-Jacques · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods: The study was based on a retrospective analysis of pharmacist interventions for DRPs detected during the medication order review and documented into the French Act-IP© database over a 12-year period. DRPs and PIs were analyzed, and independent factors of physician acceptance were assessed via multiple logistic regression. Results: Out of the 620,620 PIs registered, 29,694 targeted a PPI (4.8%). PPI's DRPs were mostly related to the prescription of a "drug not available at the hospital" (26.1%) and a "drug use without indication" (18.3%); PIs were mostly "drug switch" (35.9%) and "drug discontinuation" (26.1%). In all, 18,919 PIs were accepted by physicians (63.7%). Acceptance was significantly associated with patient age: less accepted for the 18-75 years group (OR = 0.59, 95 CI [0.46-0.76]), and the >75 years group (OR = 0.57, 95 CI [0.44-0.73]) vs. <18 years group; for the type of DRP, "drug use without indication" was the less accepted (OR = 0.73, 95 CI [0.63-0.85]); for the type of PI, "dose adjustment" was the less accepted (OR = 0.32, 95 CI [0.23-0.45]). Conclusion: Pharmacists contribute to preventing DRPs associated with PPI prescriptions during the medication order review process. Moreover, they often detect PPIs used without indication and they propose drug discontinuation, which contributes to the PPI deprescribing process. PIs should be further developed in the future to reduce PPI overprescription.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacy Service, HospitalAdolescentAdultAgedHospitalsHumansMedication ErrorsMiddle AgedPharmacistsProton Pump InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35846437
PMCPMC9256420
OpenAlexW4283710044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.