Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35846348›Full record

ArticleBio-design and manufacturing2022

In vivo evaluation of additively manufactured multi-layered scaffold for the repair of large osteochondral defects.

Maryam Tamaddon, Gordon Blunn, Rongwei Tan, Pan Yang, Xiaodan Sun, Shen-Mao Chen, Jiajun Luo, Ziyu Liu, Ling Wang, Dichen Li and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-design and manufacturing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biological Reinforced Concrete for Cartilage Repair With 3D Printing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Maryam TamaddonInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, University College London, Stanmore, HA7 4LP UK.
Gordon BlunnSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 2DT UK.
Rongwei TanGuangdong Engineering Research Center of Implantable Medical Polymer, Shenzhen Lando Biomaterials Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, 518107 China.
Pan YangGuangdong Engineering Research Center of Implantable Medical Polymer, Shenzhen Lando Biomaterials Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, 518107 China.
Xiaodan SunSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 China.
Shen-Mao ChenInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, University College London, Stanmore, HA7 4LP UK.
Jiajun LuoInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, University College London, Stanmore, HA7 4LP UK.
Ziyu LiuInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, University College London, Stanmore, HA7 4LP UK.
Ling WangState Key Laboratory for Manufacturing System Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710054 China.
Dichen LiState Key Laboratory for Manufacturing System Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710054 China.
Ricardo DonateDepartamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Grupo de Investigación en Fabricación Integrada y Avanzada, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus Universitario de Tafira s/n, 35017 Las Palmas, Spain.
Mario MonzónDepartamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Grupo de Investigación en Fabricación Integrada y Avanzada, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus Universitario de Tafira s/n, 35017 Las Palmas, Spain.
Chaozong LiuInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, University College London, Stanmore, HA7 4LP UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9854-4043
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital · GBShenzhen Metro (China) · CNUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ESXi'an Jiaotong University · CNTsinghua University · CNUniversity of Portsmouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The repair of osteochondral defects is one of the major clinical challenges in orthopaedics. Well-established osteochondral tissue engineering methods have shown promising results for the early treatment of small defects. However, less success has been achieved for the regeneration of large defects, which is mainly due to the mechanical environment of the joint and the heterogeneous nature of the tissue. In this study, we developed a multi-layered osteochondral scaffold to match the heterogeneous nature of osteochondral tissue by harnessing additive manufacturing technologies and combining the established art laser sintering and material extrusion techniques. The developed scaffold is based on a titanium and polylactic acid matrix-reinforced collagen "sandwich" composite system. The microstructure and mechanical properties of the scaffold were examined, and its safety and efficacy in the repair of large osteochondral defects were tested in an ovine condyle model. The 12-week in vivo evaluation period revealed extensive and significantly higher bone in-growth in the multi-layered scaffold compared with the collagen-HAp scaffold, and the achieved stable mechanical fixation provided strong support to the healing of the overlying cartilage, as demonstrated by hyaline-like cartilage formation. The histological examination showed that the regenerated cartilage in the multi-layer scaffold group was superior to that formed in the control group. Chondrogenic genes such as aggrecan and collagen-II were upregulated in the scaffold and were higher than those in the control group. The findings showed the safety and efficacy of the cell-free "translation-ready" osteochondral scaffold, which has the potential to be used in a one-step surgical procedure for the treatment of large osteochondral defects. Graphic abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42242-021-00177-w.

Indexed as

Additive manufacturingLarge animalOsteochondral scaffoldPorous titanium

Identifiers

PMID35846348
PMCPMC9279224
OpenAlexW4220751838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.