Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35846342›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Reproducibility of Densitometric and Biomechanical Assessment of the Mouse Tibia From

Sara Oliviero, Vee San Cheong, Bryant C Roberts, Carlos Amnael Orozco Diaz, William Griffiths, Ilaria Bellantuono, Enrico Dall'Ara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara OlivieroDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, Mellanby Centre for bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Vee San CheongINSIGNEO Institute for In Silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Bryant C RobertsDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, Mellanby Centre for bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Carlos Amnael Orozco DiazDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, Mellanby Centre for bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
William GriffithsINSIGNEO Institute for In Silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Ilaria BellantuonoDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, Mellanby Centre for bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Enrico Dall'AraDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, Mellanby Centre for bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
University of Sheffield · GBInsigneo · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventions for bone diseases (e.g. osteoporosis) require testing in animal models before clinical translation and the mouse tibia is among the most common tested anatomical sites.

Indexed as

Cancellous BoneTibiaAnimalsBone DensityMiceReproducibility of ResultsX-Ray Microtomographybone mineralfinite elementmicroCTmorphometricmouse tibiareproducibility

Identifiers

PMID35846342
PMCPMC9282377
OpenAlexW4283730098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.