ReviewEJHaem2022
Characterization of real-world treatment practices and outcomes among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated in a Finnish tertiary center.
Review in EJHaem, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Real-world disease characteristics and frontline treatments used in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in Bulgaria: An observational cohort study (DESCRIBE).The Journal of international medical research · 2026Observational
- Disease characteristics, treatment, and outcomes in Chinese chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients following BTK inhibitor discontinuation: a multicenter real-world study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Addressing cardiovascular toxicities of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: practical recommendations for haematologists in central and eastern Europe.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Real-world study on patient characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes for treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia during 2013-2022 in Finland.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Article
- A decade of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia therapy in Germany: Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes (2010-2022).EJHaem · 2024Article
- Network meta-analysis of novel targeted therapies for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Article
- Treatment pattern of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma in Korea: a multicenter retrospective study (KCSG LY20-06).The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We conducted this retrospective study to characterize the change in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment patterns between 2005 and 2019, to understand the treatment sequencing across the course of the disease, and to investigate how targeted agents and prognostic testing were implemented into the patient care. Methods: This study included adult patients with CLL treated at the Hospital District of Southwest Finland during the study period. Data were collected from the Turku University Hospital data lake. Results: In total, 122 and 60 patients received first- and second-line treatments for CLL, respectively. The shift from conventional chemoimmunotherapy to targeted treatments in recent years (2014-2019) was observed. The median overall survival times were not reached in patients treated with targeted agents compared to conventional standard treatments in first- and second-line settings and improved toward the end of the study period. Prognostic testing increased during the study follow-up and patients with unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable showed significantly poorer overall survival and time-to-next-treatment outcomes than patients with mutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable. Conclusions: This real-world study implicated added value of targeted chemo-free therapies as reported in randomized clinical trials, and highlighted the necessity of prognostic testing in order to improve treatment selection and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.