Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35846182›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2022

A Pilot Study of Modified Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercises (Mini-CEX) in Rotation Students in the Department of Endocrinology.

Yanju He, Song Wen, Mingyue Zhou, Xiucai Li, Min Gong, Ligang Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yanju He *Department of Endocrinology, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201399, People's Republic of China.
Song Wen *Department of Endocrinology, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201399, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6173-0507
Mingyue ZhouHelen Driller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Xiucai LiDepartment of Endocrinology, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201399, People's Republic of China.
Min GongDepartment of Endocrinology, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201399, People's Republic of China.
Ligang ZhouDepartment of Endocrinology, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201399, People's Republic of China.
Fudan University · CNUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) is an excellent tool for assessing the clinical abilities of medical students in intense clinical practice. In this study, the Mini-CEX was adapted to professional questionnaires for Diabetes Mellitus (DM), and examined in medical students completing their clerkship rotation in the department of endocrinology. Methods: From January 2021 to January 2022, all rotating medical students at Shanghai Pudong Hospital completed two mini-CEX exams before and following their rotation under the supervision and guidance of six tutors. The mini-CEX form was modified in this study primarily for inpatient management based on our clinical experience and updated DM guidelines of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), and the Chinese Diabetes Society (CDS). Each component of the mini-CEX assessment, including medical interviews, physical examination, clinical judgment, clinical management, and overall clinical competence was evaluated using a nine-item questionnaire. Results: Our findings revealed that the second-round performance on the assessments significantly improved, as indicated by higher scores on each component. The Pearson association analysis revealed that the feedback time of the first examination was markedly associated with improved overall scores (r= 0.391, p<0.001). However, no correlations were discovered between patient age, gender, disease severity disparity, or the interval between examinations (p>0.05). Additional regression analysis revealed that the feedback time during the initial examination was the most significant contributor to the increased overall scores (β=0.391, p<0.001). Conclusion: This newly designed mini-CEX form based on current ADA and EASD guidelines may assist trainees in more effectively diagnosing and managing DM in inpatients, particularly those with macrovascular, microvascular, or peripheral nerve neuropathy. This study aims to assess the efficacy of administering a modified mini-CEX form to rotating trainees participating in an endocrine clerkship.

Indexed as

diabetesfeedback timemedical studentmini-clinical evaluation exercise

Identifiers

PMID35846182
PMCPMC9278438
OpenAlexW4284977076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.