ArticleJournal of tropical medicine2022
Molecular Characterization and Antimicrobial Resistance of Pathogenic
Article in Journal of tropical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virulence Traits and Drug Resistance of STEC Isolated from Layer Poultry andMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Serogroups, antibiotic resistance profiles and virulence factors of non-O157 Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli from ovine and caprine.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Shiga Toxin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2025Review
- DiarrheagenicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Characterization of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Molecular detection of Shiga toxin and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli isolates from sheep and goats.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- Designing of immunodiagnostic assay using polyclonal antibodies for detection of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pathogenic Result: In the current investigation, out of 110 stool samples, Conclusion: This study demonstrated important pathogenic
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.