Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35845966›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2022

Periapical Healing following Root Canal Treatment Using Different Endodontic Sealers: A Systematic Review.

Akshay Khandelwal, Krishnamachari Janani, KavalipurapuVenkata Teja, Jerry Jose, Gopi Battineni, Francesco Riccitiello, Alessandra Valletta, Ajitha Palanivelu, Gianrico Spagnuolo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06400030 (The Effects of BioCeramic Sealer With Single Cone Technique on the Healing of Periapical Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06400030 nacompletednot on this map

The Effects of BioCeramic Sealer With Single Cone Technique on the Healing of Periapical Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDamascus UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled41ConditionsPeriapical LesionsArmsRoot canal treatment with AH Plus sealer, Root canal treatment with BioCeramic sealer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bioceramic versus conventional endodontic sealers: An umbrella review.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. BioceramicHistology and histopathology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Akshay KhandelwalConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Gajanan Clinic, Kolkata, 700025 West Bengal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-3898
Krishnamachari JananiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, 600089 Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1779-8525
KavalipurapuVenkata TejaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Mamata Institute of Dental Sciences, Bachupally, Hyderabad, 500090 Telangana State, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0123-8873
Jerry JoseDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College & Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical & Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4555-7171
Gopi BattineniClinical Research Centre School of Medicinal and Health Product Sciences, University of Camerino, Camerino 62032, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0603-2356
Francesco RiccitielloDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples, Naples 80138, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0682-6271
Alessandra VallettaDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples, Naples 80138, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5767-7528
Ajitha PalaniveluDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College & Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical & Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4985-697X
Gianrico SpagnuoloDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples, Naples 80138, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3769-9786

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The healing of the periapical tissues is crucial to the success of root canal treatment. The review studies effectively examine various endodontic root canal sealants in terms of periapical healing. This systematic review was formulated following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) number-CRD42021239192. To find relevant articles, PubMed Central and Medline databases (until February 2022) were searched. Studies that evaluated healing following the application of different endodontic sealers were analysed. A primary outcome measure was the resolution of periapical lesions following the endodontic treatment. In vivo studies comparing radiographic treatment outcomes and articles with a minimum of 6-month follow-up were included. A total of 9 clinical trial studies that met all the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. The overall risk of bias was high in four studies out of nine studies. Periapical lesions showed significant healing after endodontic treatment regardless of sealer type, although bioceramic and bioactive sealers had shown better results.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CavityRoot Canal Filling MaterialsRoot Canal TherapyTreatment OutcomeWound HealingRoot Canal Filling Materials

Identifiers

PMID35845966
PMCPMC9286882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.