Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35845921›Full record

SynthesisPathology oncology research : POR2022

Pathological Diagnosis, Work-Up and Reporting of Breast Cancer 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer.

Gábor Cserni, Monika Francz, Balázs Járay, Endre Kálmán, Ilona Kovács, Tibor Krenács, Erika Tóth, Nóra Udvarhelyi, László Vass, András Vörös and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gábor CserniDepartment of Pathology, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary.
Monika FranczDepartment of Pathology, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg County Hospitals and University Teaching Hospital, "Jósa András" Teaching Hospital, Nyíregyháza, Hungary.
Balázs JárayMedserv Kft., Budapest, Hungary.
Endre KálmánInstitute of Pathology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Ilona KovácsDepartment of Pathology, University of Debrecen, "Kenézy Gyula" University Hospital, Debrecen, Hungary.
Tibor KrenácsDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Erika TóthDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
Nóra UdvarhelyiDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
László VassDepartment of Pathology, Pest County "Flór Ferenc" University Teaching Hospital, Kistarcsa, Hungary.
András VörösInstitute of Pathology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Ana KrivokucaInstitute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Karol KajoDepartment of Pathology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Katarína Kajová MachálekováDepartment of Pathology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Janina KulkaDepartment of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This text is based on the recommendations accepted by the 4th Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer, modified on the basis of the international consultation and conference within the frames of the Central-Eastern European Academy of Oncology. The recommendations cover non-operative, intraoperative and postoperative diagnostics, determination of prognostic and predictive markers and the content of cytology and histology reports. Furthermore, they address some specific issues such as the current status of multigene molecular markers, the role of pathologists in clinical trials and prerequisites for their involvement, and some remarks about the future.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsConsensusFemaleHumansHungaryMedical OncologyPrognosisbreast cancerconsensus conferencediagnosticspathologyrecommendations

Identifiers

PMID35845921
PMCPMC9284216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.