Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35845859›Full record

ReviewJournal of affective disorders reports2022

A systematic review of psychosocial functioning and quality of life in older people with bipolar disorder.

Dr Elizabeth Tyler, Professor Fiona Lobban, Mr Bogdan Hadarag, Professor Steven Jones

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of affective disorders reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dr Elizabeth TylerSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Professor Fiona LobbanSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Mr Bogdan HadaragDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Professor Steven JonesSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Mental Health Research UK · GBLancaster University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is evidence to suggest that older people with Bipolar Disorder (BD) are more likely to demonstrate poor levels of functioning and score lower on well-being scales compared to non-clinical controls, even when in remission (Depp et al., 2006). To our knowledge, this is the first review paper to identify how quality of life and functioning has been measured in an older adult BD population. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies including a quantitative measure of psychosocial functioning or quality of life and older people over the age of 50 with a formal diagnosis of BD I or II. Results: Eleven studies ( Limitations: The review used a comprehensive and systematic search strategy, however, very few eligible studies were available for review. The pooled analyses and reported means must be interpreted with caution due to the relatively small sample sizes. Conclusions: Older people with BD present with a wide range of functioning, ranging 'major impairment' to 'superior' scores. No existing validated measure assessing the psychosocial functioning or quality of life of older people with BD could be identified. Such a tool should be developed for use in future research.

Indexed as

Bipolar disorderOlder adultPsychosocial functioningQuality of lifeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35845859
PMCPMC9272766
OpenAlexW4281259163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.