Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35845818›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology2020

Estimating densities with non-linear support by using Fisher-Gaussian kernels.

Minerva Mukhopadhyay, Didong Li, David B Dunson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Spherical Manifolds Capture Drug-Induced Changes in Tumor Cell Cycle Behavior.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2025
    Article
  2. Spherical Rotation Dimension Reduction with Geometric Loss Functions.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Minerva MukhopadhyayIndian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.
Didong LiDuke University, Durham, USA.
David B DunsonDuke University, Durham, USA.

Funding

Reproducibility and Robustness of Dimensionality ReductionR01ES027498 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HERRING, AMY H · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Structured nonparametric methods for mixtures of exposuresR01ES028804 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DUNSON, DAVID BRIAN · 2018 to 2021
$2.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027498NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES028804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current tools for multivariate density estimation struggle when the density is concentrated near a non-linear subspace or manifold. Most approaches require the choice of a kernel, with the multivariate Gaussian kernel by far the most commonly used. Although heavy-tailed and skewed extensions have been proposed, such kernels cannot capture curvature in the support of the data. This leads to poor performance unless the sample size is very large relative to the dimension of the data. The paper proposes a novel generalization of the Gaussian distribution, which includes an additional curvature parameter. We refer to the proposed class as Fisher-Gaussian kernels, since they arise by sampling from a von Mises-Fisher density on the sphere and adding Gaussian noise. The Fisher-Gaussian density has an analytic form and is amenable to straightforward implementation within Bayesian mixture models by using Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. We provide theory on large support and illustrate gains relative to competitors in simulated and real data applications.

Indexed as

Bayesian mixture modelsKernel density estimationManifold learningMarkov chain Monte Carlo methodsMixture modelSpherical datavon Mises–Fisher density

Identifiers

PMID35845818
PMCPMC9286319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.