ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Significance of the Expression of TC and TG Levels in the Initial Diagnosis and Treatment of SCLC Patients and Their Tie-In with Prognosis.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of efficacy and safety between loading-dose atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in cerebral infarction.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Analysis of Baseline Serum Lipid Profile for Predicting Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2023Article
- Retracted: Significance of the Expression of TC and TG Levels in the Initial Diagnosis and Treatment of SCLC Patients and Their Tie-In with Prognosis.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-27Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/801B16621D6946D68A6934A3F3E206
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The article examines the expression of TC and TG levels in the initial diagnosis and treatment of SCLC patients and their tie-in with prognosis. Patients with SCLC are included in the case set, who are initially treated in the tumor center of our hospital from January 2020 to January 2021 and are confirmed by histopathology or cytology as the research subjects. 80 healthy volunteers are included in the control set, who received physical examination. All the enrolled patients received the first-line standard treatment plan, and the clinical data of all SCLC patients are inquired through the medical record file system of the hospital. At the initial diagnosis and treatment, the TG and TC levels of all patients and healthy persons are measured and recorded by blood biochemistry. For SCLC patients, the risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with progression-free survival include newly diagnosed TC, TG levels, and tumor stage. Combined TC and TG detection can be used as indicators to predict the prognosis of the patients. TC and TG are significantly correlated with the prognosis of the patients with progression-free survival time. It is worthy of clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.