Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35845649›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Genomic Prediction Strategies for Dry-Down-Related Traits in Maize.

Pengzun Ni, Mahlet Teka Anche, Yanye Ruan, Dongdong Dang, Nicolas Morales, Lingyue Li, Meiling Liu, Shu Wang, Kelly R Robbins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. In-Season Predictions Using ChlorophyllPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pengzun NiShenyang Key Laboratory of Maize Genomic Selection Breeding, Liaoning Province Research Center of Plant Genetic Engineering Technology, College of Biological Science and Technology, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Mahlet Teka AncheSection of Plant Breeding and Genetics, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Yanye RuanShenyang Key Laboratory of Maize Genomic Selection Breeding, Liaoning Province Research Center of Plant Genetic Engineering Technology, College of Biological Science and Technology, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Dongdong DangShenyang Key Laboratory of Maize Genomic Selection Breeding, Liaoning Province Research Center of Plant Genetic Engineering Technology, College of Biological Science and Technology, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Nicolas MoralesSection of Plant Breeding and Genetics, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Lingyue LiShenyang Key Laboratory of Maize Genomic Selection Breeding, Liaoning Province Research Center of Plant Genetic Engineering Technology, College of Biological Science and Technology, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Meiling LiuShenyang Key Laboratory of Maize Genomic Selection Breeding, Liaoning Province Research Center of Plant Genetic Engineering Technology, College of Biological Science and Technology, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Shu WangCollege of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Kelly R RobbinsSection of Plant Breeding and Genetics, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For efficient mechanical harvesting, low grain moisture content at harvest time is essential. Dry-down rate (DR), which refers to the reduction in grain moisture content after the plants enter physiological maturity, is one of the main factors affecting the amount of moisture in the kernels. Dry-down rate is estimated using kernel moisture content at physiological maturity and at harvest time; however, measuring kernel water content at physiological maturity, which is sometimes referred as kernel water content at black layer formation (BWC), is time-consuming and resource-demanding. Therefore, inferring BWC from other correlated and easier to measure traits could improve the efficiency of breeding efforts for dry-down-related traits. In this study, multi-trait genomic prediction models were used to estimate genetic correlations between BWC and water content at harvest time (HWC) and flowering time (FT). The results show there is moderate-to-high genetic correlation between the traits (0.24-0.66), which supports the use of multi-trait genomic prediction models. To investigate genomic prediction strategies, several cross-validation scenarios representing possible implementations of genomic prediction were evaluated. The results indicate that, in most scenarios, the use of multi-trait genomic prediction models substantially increases prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the inclusion of historical records for correlated traits can improve prediction accuracy, even when the target trait is not measured on all the plots in the training set.

Indexed as

correlated traitsdry-down rategenomic predictionkernel water contentMT-GBLUP

Identifiers

PMID35845649
PMCPMC9280646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.