ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of caplacizumab versus placebo in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a meta-analysis and systematic review based on randomized controlled trials.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information Analyses of Caplacizumab for the Treatment of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura in Brazil.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of caplacizumab in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). TTP is a potentially fatal disorder characterized by systemic microvascular thrombosis. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP and Wanfang databases. RCTs of caplacizumab treatment for TPP were mainly included. Data from eligible studies were extracted and analyzed using relative effect sizes versus placebo use. The Cochrane bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias of included studies, and the assessment results were presented graphically in Revman5.3. Results: Four RCTs with a total of 416 patients were included, all of which were of high quality. Caplacizumab was associated with improvements in platelet counts normalization time [weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.55 to 0.19, I Conclusions: Caplacizumab shortens the platelet normalization time, PE time, and hospital stay in patients with TTP, and did not significantly increase the risk of adverse events. These results indicate that caplacizumab treatment provides significant benefits to patients with TTP. Even though this is evidence from RCTs, few original studies were included, so more multicenter RCTs are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.