Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35845514›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

The use of Esketamine in CT-guided percutaneous liver tumor ablation reduces the consumption of remifentanil: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.

Yanbing Su, Jianxing Zhang, Huanwei Wang, Yangkui Gu, Handong Ouyang, Wan Huang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yanbing Su *Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jianxing Zhang *Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Huanwei WangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yangkui GuSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Handong OuyangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Wan HuangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the anesthesia management of percutaneous liver tumor ablation, the requirement of analgesia is very strict. Currently, intravenous anesthesia is commonly used, such as remifentanil combined with sedative drugs. However, the pain relief is not instantaneous after increasing the dosage of remifentanil. Esketamine, a medium- or long-term analgesic drug, does not inhibit respiration to maintain patient comfort during the ablation and reduces the consumption of remifentanil. Therefore, this experiment was designed to investigate the potential of combinational therapy and the most appropriate dose of esketamine. Methods: A total of 120 patients were randomly divided into three groups by SPSS. The regular anesthesia model included dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg, intravenous glucose tolerance test, remifentanil continuous infusion, flurbiprofen 50 mg, i.v., palonosetron 0.225 mg, i.v., and 1% lidocaine for local anesthesia. Group A was the regular control group, only using the regular model; Group B also received with 0.1 mg/kg esketamine, i.v.; and Group C also received 0.2 mg/kg esketamine, i.v.. The whole experiment was double-blind. Results: From December 2020 to March 2021, 120 patients were randomized in total, and 108 were included in the analysis: 36, 37, 35 were allocated to Group A, Group B, and Group C, respectively. The total dosage of remifentanil in Group A, Group B, Group C was 179.38±123.37, 120.31±57.96 and 115.91±62.42 µg, respectively. We found the total dosage of remifentanil in Group B and Group C were significantly decreased in comparison to that of Group A (P=0.004, P=0.003, respectively). The maximum dosage of remifentanil in Group A, Group B, and Group C was 1.76±0.62, 1.37±0.47, and 1.33±0.56 ng/mL, respectively. The maximum dosage of remifentanil in Group B and Group C were significantly decreased in comparison to that of Group A (P=0.003, P=0.001, respectively). The incidence of severe pain during the ablation in Group B was significantly lower than that in Group A (3 Conclusions: The use of esketamine can reduce the dosage of opioids for liver tumor ablation and reduce the occurrence of severe pain. We found that 0.1 mg/kg esketamine, i.v. is the most suitable dose for liver tumor ablation. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100049152.

Indexed as

ablationanalgesiaEsketamineliver tumorsedation

Identifiers

PMID35845514
PMCPMC9279786
OpenAlexW4285273636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.