ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Bortezomib, epirubicin, and dexamethasone (PAD) results in superior free-progression survival compared to bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCD) treatment in non-transplantation newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients aged between 50 to 65: a retrospective single-center analysis in non-transplant patients.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world clinical outcomes of autologous stem cell transplantation in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic literature review.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To explore the optimum induction therapy for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are eligible but have not yet received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in China. Methods: A total of 140 NDMM patients with cytogenetic background were selected from the Chang Zheng Hospital for this study. The induction therapy consisted of combined bortezomib (1.3 mg/m Results: Of the 140 patients enrolled, 56 were treated with VCD and 84 received the PAD regimen. Compared to patients treated with VCD, patients receiving PAD treatment showed better free-progression survival (PFS) (hazard ratio: 0.355; 95% confidence interval: 0.214 to 0.591; P<0.001) and response rates, defined as achieving very good partial response (VGPR) or better (VCD Conclusions: This analysis demonstrated that PAD treatment resulted in better PFS compared to VCD in NDMM patients (aged 50-55 years old) who are eligible for but refuse ASCT therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.