ReviewEcology and evolution2022
Empirical and philosophical problems with the subspecies rank.
Review in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Investigation of Population Structure in a Secretive, Semi-Fossorial Snake (Colubridae:Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Phylogeography and Population Genetics of the Kentucky Endemic Cave Beetle GenusEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- On the validity of Plecturocebus parecis Gusmão et al., 2019, a titi monkey described from southwestern Brazilian Amazonia.Primates; journal of primatology · 2026Article
- Article
- Taxonomic reassessment and color-pattern polymorphism of the Oriental fire-bellied newtZooKeys · 2026Article
- Two new species ofPhytoKeys · 2026Article
- Rare PrimateAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge.Journal of mammalogy · 2025Article
- The GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Distinguishing species boundaries from geographic variation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Deforestation-induced Hybridization in Philippine Frogs Creates a Distinct Phenotype With an Inviable Genotype.Heredity · 2025Article
- Secondary contact erodes Pleistocene diversification in a wide-ranging freshwater mussel (Quadrula).Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Phylogenomics and Pervasive Genome-Wide Phylogenetic Discordance Among Fin Whales (Balaenoptera physalus).Systematic biology · 2024Article
- Understanding species limits through the formation of phylogeographic lineages.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- DoTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Article
- Taxonomic inflation as a conservation trap for inbred populations.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Species delimitation, discovery and conservation in a tiger beetle species complex despite discordant genetic data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- PhytoKeys · 2024Article
- A new combination for a neglected member ofPhytoKeys · 2024Article
- The good, the bad and the boa: An unexpected new species of a true boa revealed by morphological and molecular evidence.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species-level taxonomy derives from empirical sources (data and techniques) that assess the existence of spatiotemporal evolutionary lineages via various species "concepts." These concepts determine if observed lineages are independent given a particular methodology and ontology, which relates the metaphysical species concept to what "kind" of thing a species is in reality. Often, species concepts fail to link epistemology back to ontology. This lack of coherence is in part responsible for the persistence of the subspecies rank, which in modern usage often functions as a placeholder between the evolutionary events of divergence or collapse of incipient species. Thus, prospective events like lineages merging or diverging require information from unknowable future information. This is also conditioned on evidence that the lineage already has a detectably distinct evolutionary history. Ranking these lineages as subspecies can seem attractive given that many lineages do not exhibit intrinsic reproductive isolation. We argue that using subspecies is indefensible on philosophical and empirical grounds. Ontologically, the rank of subspecies is either identical to that of species or undefined in the context of evolutionary lineages representing spatiotemporally defined individuals. Some species concepts more inclined to consider subspecies, like the Biological Species Concept, are disconnected from evolutionary ontology and do not consider genealogy. Even if ontology is ignored, methods addressing reproductive isolation are often indirect and fail to capture the range of scenarios linking gene flow to species identity over space and time. The use of subspecies and reliance on reproductive isolation as a basis for an operational species concept can also conflict with ethical issues governing the protection of species. We provide a way forward for recognizing and naming species that links theoretical and operational species concepts regardless of the magnitude of reproductive isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.