Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35845346›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genome editing2022

Invited Mini-Review Research Topic: Utilization of Protoplasts to Facilitate Gene Editing in Plants: Schemes for

Erik Andreasson, Nam Phuong Kieu, Muhammad Awais Zahid, Frida Meijer Carlsen, Lenman Marit, Sjur Sandgrind, Bent Larsen Petersen, Li-Hua Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genome editing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficient regeneration of protoplasts fromBiology methods & protocols · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Erik AndreassonDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lomma, Sweden.
Nam Phuong KieuDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lomma, Sweden.
Muhammad Awais ZahidDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lomma, Sweden.
Frida Meijer CarlsenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Lenman MaritDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lomma, Sweden.
Sjur SandgrindDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lomma, Sweden.
Bent Larsen PetersenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Li-Hua ZhuDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lomma, Sweden.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schemes for efficient regenerationand recovery of shoots from

Indexed as

Brassica napusgene editingpotatoprotoplastrapeseedrefreshmentregenerationSolanum tuberosum

Identifiers

PMID35845346
PMCPMC9276966
OpenAlexW4283706652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.