Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35845252›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry journal2022

Quality of Media Reporting of Suicide in Nepal.

Pawan Sharma, Ravi Raj Timasina, Swarndeep Singh, Shreeya Gyawali, Kedar Marahatta, S M Yasir Arafat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pawan SharmaPatan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4983-7568
Ravi Raj TimasinaGandaki Medical College Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9504-2032
Swarndeep SinghAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9211-3915
Shreeya GyawaliNorth East London NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5462-7755
Kedar MarahattaWorld Health Organization Country Office for Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8997-8248
S M Yasir ArafatEnam Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0521-5708

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Suicide is a major public health concern. Sensible media reporting of suicide is one of the important prevention strategies. There has been no report assessing the quality of media reporting of suicide in Nepal. We aimed to assess the quality of newspaper reporting of suicide in Nepal against the World Health Organization (WHO) reporting guidelines. Methods: We undertook a content analysis study of articles from the online archives on reporting of suicide deaths in six English language (daily or weekly) newspapers published in Nepal over the two-year duration from a period between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. Also, we compared them with the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Results: A total of 165 English newspaper articles reporting on suicide were analyzed. 163 (98.8%) of news were published in the main section of the newspaper, and the mean length was 17.6 sentences. The name and age of the person who died of suicide were mentioned in about 69.1% ( Conclusions: The adherence to the WHO guidelines for media reporting of suicide in Nepal was found to be poor, with a large majority of news reports having at least one potentially harmful media characteristic. Only a small minority of news reports included potentially helpful information to prevent suicide.

Identifiers

PMID35845252
PMCPMC9282984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.