Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35845213›Full record

ReviewEJHaem2021

The beginning of a new therapeutic era in acute myeloid leukemia.

Christian Récher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EJHaem, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Synthesis of an Anti-CD7 Recombinant Immunotoxin Based on PE24 in CHO andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christian RécherService d'Hématologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse Toulouse France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3332-4525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of AML, the early 2000s were shaped by the advent of novel molecular biology technologies including high-throughput sequencing that improved prognostic classification, response evaluation through the quantification of minimal residual disease, and the launch of research on targeted therapies. Our knowledge of leukemogenesis, AML genetic diversity, gene-gene interactions, clonal evolution, and treatment response assessment has also greatly improved. New classifications based on chromosomal abnormalities and gene mutations are now integrated on a routine basis. These considerable efforts contributed to the discovery and development of promising drugs which specifically target gene mutations, apoptotic pathways and cell surface antigens as well as reformulate classical cytotoxic agents. In less than 2 years, nine novels drugs have been approved for the treatment of AML patients, and many others are being intensively investigated, in particular immune therapies. There are now numerous clinical research opportunities offered to clinicians, thanks to these new treatment options. We are only at the start of a new era which should see major disruptions in the way we understand, treat, and monitor patients with AML.

Indexed as

acute myeloid leukemiaCPX‐351enasidenibFLT3 inhibitorsgemtuzumab ozogamycingilteritinibglasdegibIDH inhibitorsivosidenibmidostaurinmonoclonal antibodiesoral azacitidineTP53venetoclax

Identifiers

PMID35845213
PMCPMC9175720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.