Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35845167›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Why do mice squeak? Toward a better understanding of defensive vocalization.

Julia Ruat, Andreas J Genewsky, Daniel E Heinz, Sebastian F Kaltwasser, Newton S Canteras, Michael Czisch, Alon Chen, Carsten T Wotjak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Developmental encoding of natural sounds in the mouse auditory cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A cholinergic auditory pathway.Nature neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julia RuatDepartment Stress Neurobiology and Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany.
Andreas J GenewskyResearch Group Neuronal Plasticity, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany.
Daniel E HeinzResearch Group Neuronal Plasticity, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany.
Sebastian F KaltwasserResearch Group Neuronal Plasticity, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany.
Newton S CanterasDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.
Michael CzischScientific Core Unit Neuroimaging, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany.
Alon ChenDepartment Stress Neurobiology and Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany.
Carsten T WotjakResearch Group Neuronal Plasticity, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although mice mostly communicate in the ultrasonic range, they also emit audible calls. We demonstrate that mice selectively bred for high anxiety-related behavior (HAB) have a high disposition for emitting sonic calls when caught by the tail. The vocalization was unrelated to pain but sensitive to anxiolytics. As revealed by manganese-enhanced MRI, HAB mice displayed an increased tonic activity of the periaqueductal gray (PAG). Selective inhibition of the dorsolateral PAG not only reduced anxiety-like behavior but also completely abolished sonic vocalization. Calls were emitted at a fundamental frequency of 3.8 kHz, which falls into the hearing range of numerous predators. Indeed, playback of sonic vocalization attracted rats if associated with a stimulus mouse. If played back to HAB mice, sonic calls were repellent in the absence of a conspecific but attractive in their presence. Our data demonstrate that sonic vocalization attracts both predators and conspecifics depending on the context.

Indexed as

behavioral neurosciencebiological sciencesneurosciencesystems neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID35845167
PMCPMC9283514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.