ArticleJournal of geriatric cardiology : JGC2022
Establishment of a diagnostic model of coronary heart disease in elderly patients with diabetes mellitus based on machine learning algorithms.
Article in Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting the risk of coronary heart disease risk in diabetes mellitus patients: a dual-center retrospective study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Narrative review of the development of an ischaemic heart disease prognostic scoring tool (i-IHD score) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Malaysia.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2026Review
- Machine learning and Mendelian randomization identify key lifestyle factors in coronary heart disease: A NHANES-Based study.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
- Exploration and analysis of risk factors for coronary artery disease with type 2 diabetes based on SHAP explainable machine learning algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AI-based Assessment of Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Construction of a Prediction Model for a Treatment Regimen.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a readmission risk prediction model for elderly patients with coronary heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- A study on the risk prediction of heart disease in diabetes patients based on machine learning.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo establish a prediction model of coronary heart disease (CHD) in elderly patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) based on machine learning (ML) algorithms.
methodsBased on the Medical Big Data Research Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital in Beijing, China, we identified a cohort of elderly inpatients (≥ 60 years), including 10,533 patients with DM complicated with CHD and 12,634 patients with DM without CHD, from January 2008 to December 2017. We collected demographic characteristics and clinical data. After selecting the important features, we established five ML models, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), adaptive boosting (Adaboost) and logistic regression (LR). We compared the receiver operating characteristic curves, area under the curve (AUC) and other relevant parameters of different models and determined the optimal classification model. The model was then applied to 7447 elderly patients with DM admitted from January 2018 to December 2019 to further validate the performance of the model.
resultsFifteen features were selected and included in the ML model. The classification precision in the test set of the XGBoost, RF, DT, Adaboost and LR models was 0.778, 0.789, 0.753, 0.750 and 0.689, respectively; and the AUCs of the subjects were 0.851, 0.845, 0.823, 0.833 and 0.731, respectively. Applying the XGBoost model with optimal performance to a newly recruited dataset for validation, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, precision, and AUC were 0.792, 0.808, 0.748 and 0.880, respectively.
conclusionsThe XGBoost model established in the present study had certain predictive value for elderly patients with DM complicated with CHD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.