Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35845062›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

RELAY

Sidhant Singh, Abedalaziz O Surkhi, Sven Z C P Tan, Matti Jubouri, Damian M Bailey, Ian Williams, Mohamad Bashir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Management of Left Subclavian Artery in Aortic Open and Endovascular Surgery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sidhant SinghBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Abedalaziz O SurkhiFaculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Sven Z C P TanBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Matti JubouriHull-York Medical School, University of York, Heslington, United Kingdom.
Damian M BaileyDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Ian WilliamsNeurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Treforest, United Kingdom.
Mohamad BashirNeurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Treforest, United Kingdom.
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of South Wales · GBAl-Quds University · PSUniversity Hospital of Wales · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgical intervention remains the mainstay treatment for aortic arch aneurysm and dissection, but the high mortality and morbidity rates have led to a need for the development of minimally invasive alternatives to arch reconstruction. RELAY™ Branched (Terumo Aortic, Inchinnan, UK) represents a viable option for complex endovascular aortic arch repair. We present multi-center data from Europe documenting the efficacy of the endograft in terms of its target vessel patency and reintervention rates. Methods: Prospective data collected between January 2019 and January 2022 associated with patients treated with RELAY™ single-, double-, and triple-branched endoprostheses from centers across Europe was retrospectively analyzed with descriptive and distributive analysis. Follow up data from 30 days and 6-, 12-, and 24 months postoperatively was included. Patient follow up was evaluated in terms of target vessel patency and reintervention rates. Results: Technical success was achieved in 147 (99.3%) cases. Over 24 months period, target vessel patency was maintained in 80.2% ( Discussion: The data presented herein demonstrates that RELAY™ Branched is a technically efficacious device for endovascular aortic arch repair and is associated with favorable target vessel patency and reintervention rates. Key design features of the endoprosthesis and good perioperative management can contribute greatly to mitigating reintervention and loss of vessel patency following endovascular aortic arch repair.

Indexed as

aortic archbranched endograftreinterventionTEVARvessel patency

Identifiers

PMID35845062
PMCPMC9277010
OpenAlexW4283691867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.