Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35844913›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2022

Influence of guar gum and chitosan enriched with lemon peel essential oil coatings on the quality of pears.

Ayesha Iftikhar, Abdur Rehman, Muhammad Usman, Ahmad Ali, Muhammad Mushtaq Ahmad, Qayyum Shehzad, Hina Fatim, Arshad Mehmood, Abdul Moiz, Muhammad Asim Shabbir and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Chitosan-Orange (Food science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Ayesha IftikharNational Institute of Food Science and Technology University of Agriculture Faisalabad Faisalabad Pakistan.
Abdur RehmanState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology School of Food Science and Technology Jiangnan University Wuxi Jiangsu China.
Muhammad UsmanBeijing Advance Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health School of Food and Health Beijing Technology and Business University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1919-862X
Ahmad AliState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology School of Food Science and Technology Jiangnan University Wuxi Jiangsu China.
Muhammad Mushtaq AhmadDepartment of Food Science and Technology Riphah International University Faisalabad Faisalabad Pakistan.
Qayyum ShehzadBeijing Advance Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health School of Food and Health Beijing Technology and Business University Beijing China.
Hina FatimBeijing Advance Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health School of Food and Health Beijing Technology and Business University Beijing China.
Arshad MehmoodBeijing Advance Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health School of Food and Health Beijing Technology and Business University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2022-375X
Abdul MoizSection of Chemical and Food Engineering Department of Industrial Engineering University of Salerno Fisciano Italy.
Muhammad Asim ShabbirNational Institute of Food Science and Technology University of Agriculture Faisalabad Faisalabad Pakistan.
Muhammad Faisal ManzoorSchool of Food and Biological Engineering Jiangsu University Zhenjiang Jiangsu China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3705-0277
Azhari SiddeegDepartment of Food Engineering and Technology Faculty of Engineering and Technology University of Gezira Wad Medani Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-1962
Beijing Technology and Business University · CNJiangnan University · CNJiangsu University · CNRiphah International University · PKUniversity of Faisalabad · PKUniversity of Gezira · SDUniversity of Molise · ITUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pear is a typically climacteric fruit and highly perishable with a low shelf life owing to extreme metabolic activity after harvesting. The present study aimed to reduce weight loss and improve the firmness of pear during storage. The lemon peel essential oil (LPEO) has gained considerable attention due to being the richest source of bioactive compounds that behaved as a natural antioxidant agent, being cost-effective, and being generally recognized as safe. Edible coatings equipped with a natural antioxidant agent and renewable biopolymers have gained more research fame owing to their involvement in the direction of biodegradability and food safety. In this work, edible skin coating materials (ESCMs) embedded by chitosan (1%) and guar gum (2%) were fabricated, and afterward, five concentrations of LPEO (1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3.0%) were incorporated individually into the ESCMs. Findings revealed that LPEO-ESCMs significantly reduced the weight loss and improved the firmness of pear up to 45 days of storage at 4 ± 2°C. Furthermore, the LPEO-ESCMs have enhanced the antioxidant capacity, antibacterial efficiency, and malondialdehyde level of pear during storage time. It was concluded that 3% of LPEO-ESCMs improved the overall acceptability of pear fruits. Taken together, the novel insights of guar gum and chitosan-based ESCMs entrapped with LPEO will remain a subject of research interest for researchers in the future.

Indexed as

chitosanedible coatingsguar gumlemon peel essential oilpear

Identifiers

PMID35844913
PMCPMC9281935
OpenAlexW4220899988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.