Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35844910›Full record

ReviewFood science & nutrition2022

Proteomics as a promising biomarker in food authentication, quality and safety: A review.

Muhammad Afzaal, Farhan Saeed, Muzzamal Hussain, Farheen Shahid, Azhari Siddeeg, Ammar Al-Farga

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science & nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Food Safety-Transcriptomics and Proteomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Food for Thought: Proteomics for Meat Safety.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Muhammad AfzaalDepartment of Food Science Government College University Faisalabad Faisalabad Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9047-9075
Farhan SaeedDepartment of Food Science Government College University Faisalabad Faisalabad Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5340-4015
Muzzamal HussainDepartment of Food Science Government College University Faisalabad Faisalabad Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6508-1962
Farheen ShahidDepartment of Food Science Government College University Faisalabad Faisalabad Pakistan.
Azhari SiddeegDepartment of Food Engineering and Technology Faculty of Engineering and Technology University of Gezira Wad Medani Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-1962
Ammar Al-FargaDepartment of Biochemistry College of Sciences University of Jeddah Jeddah Saudi Arabia.
Government College University, Faisalabad · PKUniversity of Gezira · SDUniversity of Jeddah · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adulteration and mislabeling have become a very common global malpractice in food industry. Especially foods of animal origin are prepared from plant sources and intentionally mislabeled. This type of mislabeling is an important concern in food safety as the replaced ingredients may cause a food allergy or toxicity to vulnerable consumers. Moreover, foodborne pathogens also pose a major threat to food safety. There is a dire need to develop strong analytical tools to deal with related issues. In this context, proteomics stands out as a promising tool used to report the aforementioned issues. The development in the field of omics has inimitable advantages in enabling the understanding of various biological fields especially in the discipline of food science. In this review, current applications and the role of proteomics in food authenticity, safety, and quality and food traceability are highlighted comprehensively. Additionally, the other components of proteomics have also been comprehensively described. Furthermore, this review will be helpful in the provision of new intuition into the use of proteomics in food analysis. Moreover, the pathogens in food can also be identified based on differences in their protein profiling. Conclusively, proteomics, an indicator of food properties, its origin, the processes applied to food, and its composition are also the limelight of this article.

Indexed as

adulterationfoodborne pathogensfood qualityproteomics

Identifiers

PMID35844910
PMCPMC9281926
OpenAlexW4221003459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.