Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35844896›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Individual Factors Associated With COVID-19 Infection: A Machine Learning Study.

Tania Ramírez-Del Real, Mireya Martínez-García, Manlio F Márquez, Laura López-Trejo, Guadalupe Gutiérrez-Esparza, Enrique Hernández-Lemus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Artificial intelligence in triage of COVID-19 patients.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tania Ramírez-Del RealCátedras Conacyt, National Council on Science and Technology, Mexico City, Mexico.
Mireya Martínez-GarcíaClinical Research Division, National Institute of Cardiology "Ignacio Chávez", Mexico City, Mexico.
Manlio F MárquezClinical Research Division, National Institute of Cardiology "Ignacio Chávez", Mexico City, Mexico.
Laura López-TrejoInstitute for Security and Social Services of State Workers, Mexico City, Mexico.
Guadalupe Gutiérrez-EsparzaCátedras Conacyt, National Council on Science and Technology, Mexico City, Mexico.
Enrique Hernández-LemusComputational Genomics Division, National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City, Mexico.
Instituto Nacional de Cardiología · MXConsejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías · MXNational Institute of Genomic Medicine · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fast, exponential increase of COVID-19 infections and their catastrophic effects on patients' health have required the development of tools that support health systems in the quick and efficient diagnosis and prognosis of this disease. In this context, the present study aims to identify the potential factors associated with COVID-19 infections, applying machine learning techniques, particularly random forest, chi-squared, xgboost, and rpart for feature selection; ROSE and SMOTE were used as resampling methods due to the existence of class imbalance. Similarly, machine and deep learning algorithms such as support vector machines, C4.5, random forest, rpart, and deep neural networks were explored during the train/test phase to select the best prediction model. The dataset used in this study contains clinical data, anthropometric measurements, and other health parameters related to smoking habits, alcohol consumption, quality of sleep, physical activity, and health status during confinement due to the pandemic associated with COVID-19. The results showed that the XGBoost model got the best features associated with COVID-19 infection, and random forest approximated the best predictive model with a balanced accuracy of 90.41% using SMOTE as a resampling technique. The model with the best performance provides a tool to help prevent contracting SARS-CoV-2 since the variables with the highest risk factor are detected, and some of them are, to a certain extent controllable.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19feature selectionimbalanced datamachine learningpredictive model

Identifiers

PMID35844896
PMCPMC9279686
OpenAlexW4283728834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.