Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35844859›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Willingness and Perceptions Regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose in Pakistani Vaccinated Population: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Abdul Moeed, Hala Najeeb, Arisha Saleem, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar, Hania Mansoor Rafi, Abdullah Khan Khattak, Zoha Bilal, Binyam Tariku Seboka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdul MoeedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hala NajeebDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Arisha SaleemDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Sohaib AsgharDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University Ojha Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hania Mansoor RafiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Abdullah Khan KhattakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zoha BilalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Binyam Tariku SebokaSchool of Public Health, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.
Dow University of Health Sciences · PKAga Khan University · PKDilla University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine booster dose willingness and identify predictors and factors of willingness and hesitance in the vaccinated population of Pakistan. Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey was undertaken between January and February 2022 to highlight the public perceptions regarding the COVID-19 booster dose and evaluate the willingness to get the additional dose. Demographic information and booster dose willingness were recorded through the questionnaire. Additionally, a 5-point Likert scale was employed to explore fears and beliefs regarding COVID-19 vaccinations. Univariate and multivariate regression was performed to identify booster dose willingness and hesitance factors. Results: Of the 787 respondents, 69.6% were females, 75.3% fell in the 18-30 years age group, 53.5% were university students or had a Bachelor's degree. Overall, a 77.8% booster dose willingness was reported. Participants showed absence or low fear levels associated with a booster dose (47.3%). 60.1% agreed it was safe to receive an additional vaccine dose, with 44.1% agreeing that boosters are effective against coronavirus variants. Independent predictors of willingness included the absence of comorbidities, whereas not being willing to pay for the booster dose was a predictor of hesitance. Conclusion: This study showed a suboptimal willingness level of booster dose uptake among the vaccinated Pakistani population. Public health policymakers must undertake necessary awareness campaigns to strategize vaccination drives and dispel myths.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansImmunization, SecondaryMalePakistanPatient Acceptance of Health CareCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccine boosterperceptionsvaccinated populationvaccine booster dosewillingness

Identifiers

PMID35844859
PMCPMC9279681
OpenAlexW4283735059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.