ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022
Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in severe/critical patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Treatment of COVID-19-associated ARDS with umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in the STROMA-CoV-2 multicenter randomized double-blind trial: long-term safety, respiratory function, and quality of life.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Trial
- Living bio-drug therapies using mesenchymal stem cells and exosomes for mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of stem cells · 2025Article
- Fibronectin and vitronectin alleviate adipose-derived stem cells senescence during long-term culture through the AKT/MDM2/P53 pathway.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Controversies regarding transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells.World journal of transplantation · 2024Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell Priming: Potential Benefits of Administration of Molecular Hydrogen.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for COVID-19 infection.Inflammopharmacology · 2024Review
- Immunosuppressive therapy and COVID-19 infection in patients with NMOSD.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024Article
- The promising approach of MSCs therapy for COVID-19 treatment.Cell and tissue banking · 2023Review
- Scale-Up of Academic Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Production.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Investigational Use of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells and Their Secretome as Add-On Therapy in Severe Respiratory Virus Infections: Challenges and Perspectives.Advances in therapy · 2023Review
- Cancer and COVID-19: unravelling the immunological interplay with a review of promising therapies against severe SARS-CoV-2 for cancer patients.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023Review
- Efficacy of Wharton Jelly Mesenchymal Stromal Cells infusions in moderate to severe SARS-Cov-2 related acute respiratory distress syndrome: a phase 2a double-blind randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Mesenchymal stem cells: an early yet promising prospect for Asthma.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The present study aims to better understand the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in treating severe/critical patients with COVID-19. Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Chinese electronic database CNKI were searched from inception up to Dec 19, 2021. Original comparative studies for MSC treatment + standard treatment for severe/critical patients with COVID-19, with placebo or standard treatment as the control group, were included. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and adverse events (AEs). A meta-analysis was performed to compare the mortality rates between the two groups. Then, a subgroup analysis was performed according to the category of the disease (severe or critical) and MSC dose. Afterwards, a descriptive analysis was performed for AEs and secondary outcomes. The funnel plot and Egger's test were used for the publication bias assessment. Findings: Compared to placebo or standard care, MSCs provide significant benefit in the treatment of patients with severe/critical COVID-19, in terms of in-hospital mortality rate (odds ratio: 0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.84), with very low heterogeneity ( Interpretation: The present study demonstrates that MSCs are highly likely to reduce mortality and are safe to use for patients with severe or critical COVID-19, regardless of whether 1-3 doses are applied. However, due to the small sample size of the included studies, further high-quality, large-scale trials are needed to confirm this statement in the future. Funding: The National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2020YFC0860900), the Science and Technology Project of Wuhan (No. 2020020602012112), the Tianjin Science and Technology Research Program (18PTSYJC00070 and 16PTWYHZ00030), Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem Innovation Fund (HH22KYZX0046), and the Tianjin Free Trade Zone Innovation Development Project (ZMCY-03-2021002-01) funded the study. We are also grateful for the support from the 3551 Talent Plan of China Optics Valley.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.