Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35844729›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2022

The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation in Children With Asthma: A Meta-Analysis.

Meiqi Hao, Ruoxin Xu, Nachuan Luo, Miaowen Liu, Junping Xie, Wenxiong Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Asthmatic patients with vitamin D deficiency: Can vitamin D supplementation make a difference.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Vitamin D for the management of asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meiqi HaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Ruoxin XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Nachuan LuoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Miaowen LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Junping XieDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Wenxiong ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Nanchang University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: An increasing number of studies have suggested that vitamin D can be used to treat childhood asthma, but its clinical effects are still unclear. We conducted this meta-analysis to examine the latest estimates of the effectiveness and safety of using vitamin D to treat childhood asthma. Methods: The PubMed, The Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Embase, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) describing vitamin D supplementation interventions for asthmatic children. Asthma exacerbation, vitamin D levels, the predicted percentage of forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1%) and adverse effects (AEs) were analyzed as the main outcome measures. Results: After screening, eight RCTs with 738 children were included. Compared with placebos, vitamin D supplementation had a stronger effect on serum vitamin D levels [mean difference (MD) = 13.51 (4.24, 22.79), Conclusions: Vitamin D supplementation significantly increased patients' serum vitamin D levels, but it had no benefit for asthma control. However, vitamin D supplementation might reduce patients' lung function. It is essential to systemically search for more large-scale, rigorous, and well-designed RCTs to fully confirm these conclusions. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021288838, PROSPERO CRD42021288838.

Indexed as

asthmachildrenmeta-analysissystematic reviewvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID35844729
PMCPMC9277022
OpenAlexW4283706083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.