Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35844629›Full record

ArticleGeophysical research letters2021

Climate Signatures on Lake And Wetland Size Distributions in Arctic Deltas.

Lawrence Vulis, Alejandro Tejedor, Ilya Zaliapin, Joel C Rowland, Efi Foufoula-Georgiou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geophysical research letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lawrence VulisDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Irvine Irvine CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2779-8772
Alejandro TejedorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Irvine Irvine CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3800-5304
Ilya ZaliapinDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics University of Nevada Reno Reno NV USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6257-0517
Joel C RowlandEarth and Environmental Sciences Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos NM USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-8976
Efi Foufoula-GeorgiouDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Irvine Irvine CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1078-231X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how thermokarst lakes on arctic river deltas will respond to rapid warming is critical for projecting how carbon storage and fluxes will change in those vulnerable environments. Yet, this understanding is currently limited partly due to the complexity of disentangling significant interannual variability from the longer-term surface water signatures on the landscape, using the short summertime window of optical spaceborne observations. Here, we rigorously separate perennial lakes from ephemeral wetlands on 12 arctic deltas and report distinct size distributions and climate trends for the two waterbodies. Namely, we find a lognormal distribution for lakes and a power-law distribution for wetlands, consistent with a simple proportionate growth model and inundated topography, respectively. Furthermore, while no trend with temperature is found for wetlands, a statistically significant decreasing trend of mean lake size with warmer temperatures is found, attributed to colder deltas having deeper and thicker permafrost preserving larger lakes.

Indexed as

arcticdeltaspermafrostremote sensingthermokarst lakeswetlands

Identifiers

PMID35844629
PMCPMC9285363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.