ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022
Elucidation of the Application of Blood Test Biomarkers to Predict Immune-Related Adverse Events in Atezolizumab-Treated NSCLC Patients Using Machine Learning Methods.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum albumin is associated with immune-related hypothyroidism and treatment continuity in non-small cell lung cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- From real-world pharmacovigilance data to clinical practice: a geriatric-specific predictive model for immune-related adverse events in lung cancer based on routine clinical indicators.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- A Unified Framework for Survival Prediction: Combining Machine Learning Feature Selection with Traditional Survival Analysis in Heart Failure and METABRIC Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Molecular markers for the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Factors associated with immune‑related severe adverse events (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Mutations Associated With High-Grade irAEs in NSCLC Patients Receiving Immunotherapies.Clinical lung cancer · 2024Article
- The Multifaceted Role of Neutrophils in NSCLC in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Cancers · 2024Review
- Article
- Prediction of Effectiveness and Toxicities of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Using Real-World Patient Data.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Machine learning based on blood test biomarkers predicts fast progression in advanced NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy.BMJ oncology · 2024Article
- Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Immunotherapy Response in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2023Article
- The artificial intelligence and machine learning in lung cancer immunotherapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023Review
- Review
- Cutaneous immune-related adverse events to immune checkpoint inhibitors: from underlying immunological mechanisms to multi-omics prediction.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Editorial: Systemic immune dysregulation in malignant disease: Insights, monitoring and therapeutic exploitation.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Development of severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is a major predicament to stop treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, even though tumor progression is suppressed. However, no effective early phase biomarker has been established to predict irAE until now. Method: This study retrospectively used the data of four international, multi-center clinical trials to investigate the application of blood test biomarkers to predict irAEs in atezolizumab-treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Seven machine learning methods were exploited to dissect the importance score of 21 blood test biomarkers after 1,000 simulations by the training cohort consisting of 80%, 70%, and 60% of the combined cohort with 1,320 eligible patients. Results: XGBoost and LASSO exhibited the best performance in this study with relatively higher consistency between the training and test cohorts. The best area under the curve (AUC) was obtained by a 10-biomarker panel using the XGBoost method for the 8:2 training:test cohort ratio (training cohort AUC = 0.692, test cohort AUC = 0.681). This panel could be further narrowed down to a three-biomarker panel consisting of C-reactive protein (CRP), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) with a small median AUC difference using the XGBoost method [for the 8:2 training:test cohort ratio, training cohort AUC difference = -0.035 (p < 0.0001), and test cohort AUC difference = 0.001 (p=0.965)]. Conclusion: Blood test biomarkers currently do not have sufficient predictive power to predict irAE development in atezolizumab-treated advanced NSCLC patients. Nevertheless, biomarkers related to adaptive immunity and liver or thyroid dysfunction warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.